By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Last Of Us. Whats the fuss? Spoilers

FiliusDei said:
I was disappointed by the graphics. Crysis 2 looks way better than tlou and the AI when I'm suppose to be in stealth is just laughable...breaks the immersion for the game. I liked the story and other gameplay elements but this game is no masterpiece. I would give it a 8.5

UNcharted 1,2 and 3, and other sony exclusives are way better than this game. Maybe I'm just disappointed for expecting the best game of the generation. sorry but it is not!

And I stopped reading when you said Crysis 2.  Crysis 2 looks like shit on consoles.  

OT: Too each their own, but I find it funny people don't finish a game before complaining about it.  And you say you don't think reviewers were playing the same game which implies you think reviewers "opinions" are wrong.  Good thing this is your opinion though because to me this is the best game I've ever played.



Around the Network

There's way too many Last of Us threads on this site. It's a really good game, but that's all.



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash

mario galaxy 1 and 2 -> 97 on metacritic based on 77 and 88 reviews.

TLOU -> 95 on metacritic based on 94 reviews.

mario galaxy 1 -> 97.64 on gamerankings based on 78 reviews

mario galaxy 2 -> 97.35 on gamerankings based on 56 reviews

TLOUS -> 95.05 on gamerankings based on 65 reviews

Can we please stop with this game of the generation nonsense, if you prefer the game that's great. If it's your favorite game of the generation that's great. If you disagree with some of the reviews that's your problem. But Mario galaxy 1 and 2 are ranked higher on both gamerankings and metacritic, so as of right now mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation, end of story.



Something...Something...Games...Something

JakDaSnack said:
mario galaxy 1 and 2 -> 97 on metacritic based on 77 and 88 reviews.

TLOU -> 95 on metacritic based on 94 reviews.

mario galaxy 1 -> 97.64 on gamerankings based on 78 reviews

mario galaxy 2 -> 97.35 on gamerankings based on 56 reviews

TLOUS -> 95.05 on gamerankings based on 65 reviews

Can we please stop with this game of the generation nonsense, if you prefer the game that's great. If it's your favorite game of the generation that's great. If you disagree with some of the reviews that's your problem. But Mario galaxy 1 and 2 are ranked higher on both gamerankings and metacritic, so as of right now mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation, end of story.

I agree, SMG was way more innovative. Best game of the generation.



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash

nnodley said:
FiliusDei said:
I was disappointed by the graphics. Crysis 2 looks way better than tlou and the AI when I'm suppose to be in stealth is just laughable...breaks the immersion for the game. I liked the story and other gameplay elements but this game is no masterpiece. I would give it a 8.5

UNcharted 1,2 and 3, and other sony exclusives are way better than this game. Maybe I'm just disappointed for expecting the best game of the generation. sorry but it is not!

And I stopped reading when you said Crysis 2.  Crysis 2 looks like shit on consoles.  

OT: Too each their own, but I find it funny people don't finish a game before complaining about it.  And you say you don't think reviewers were playing the same game which implies you think reviewers "opinions" are wrong.  Good thing this is your opinion though because to me this is the best game I've ever played.


Somtimes TLOU looks amazing and other times its just dissapointing. Sorry but I still consider other games have better graphics including heavy rain and Crysis 2 and 3. Reviewers actually made me believe it was the best game of this generation so I was expecting a bit more.

 

Don't get me wrong, i really enjoyed the game and i hope ND will release a sequel for the ps4 soon....it's just not the best game on PS in my opinion.I'm sure they'll improve it in the future.



Around the Network
JakDaSnack said:
mario galaxy 1 and 2 -> 97 on metacritic based on 77 and 88 reviews.

TLOU -> 95 on metacritic based on 94 reviews.

mario galaxy 1 -> 97.64 on gamerankings based on 78 reviews

mario galaxy 2 -> 97.35 on gamerankings based on 56 reviews

TLOUS -> 95.05 on gamerankings based on 65 reviews

Can we please stop with this game of the generation nonsense, if you prefer the game that's great. If it's your favorite game of the generation that's great. If you disagree with some of the reviews that's your problem. But Mario galaxy 1 and 2 are ranked higher on both gamerankings and metacritic, so as of right now mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation, end of story.


If you are going by score Grand theft auto is the game of the gen, but again you and everyone else know that games releaseed earlier in the gen have a higher chance of getting rated higher, a 95 for The Last of Us even with the troll reviews that mario galaxy didn't have to deal with like quarter to 3 with 6/10 means it would be a 97-98 easily 3 years ago. So the praise of game of the gen is easily justified when it was released at the end of the gen with such good reviews.



veritaz said:
JakDaSnack said:
mario galaxy 1 and 2 -> 97 on metacritic based on 77 and 88 reviews.

TLOU -> 95 on metacritic based on 94 reviews.

mario galaxy 1 -> 97.64 on gamerankings based on 78 reviews

mario galaxy 2 -> 97.35 on gamerankings based on 56 reviews

TLOUS -> 95.05 on gamerankings based on 65 reviews

Can we please stop with this game of the generation nonsense, if you prefer the game that's great. If it's your favorite game of the generation that's great. If you disagree with some of the reviews that's your problem. But Mario galaxy 1 and 2 are ranked higher on both gamerankings and metacritic, so as of right now mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation, end of story.


If you are going by score Grand theft auto is the game of the gen, but again you and everyone else know that games releaseed earlier in the gen have a higher chance of getting rated higher, a 95 for The Last of Us even with the troll reviews that mario galaxy didn't have to deal with like quarter to 3 with 6/10 means it would be a 97-98 easily 3 years ago. So the praise of game of the gen is easily justified when it was released at the end of the gen with such good reviews.

Grand theft auto 4 has a 97.04% on gamerankings based on 60 reviews.

So since Mario galaxy is number 2 on metacritic and number 1 on gamerankings

while grandtheft auto is 3rd on gamerankings and 1 on metacritic, based on average mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation.

So your argument is invalid.  

Like I originally said, if you don't like the review, that's your problem.  Quarter to 3 didn't like the gameplay, so they gave it a bad review, but even without that bad review, mario galaxy 1 and 2 are still ranked higher.  

Also games generally get higher reviews towards the end of it's lifecycle simply because they stop innovating.  Just fixing obvious issue's won't getyou goty awards.  So no, TLOU's reviews aren't justified, if they want to be game of the generation then they have to innovate just as much as mario galaxy did, which they did not.



Something...Something...Games...Something

JakDaSnack said:
veritaz said:
JakDaSnack said:
mario galaxy 1 and 2 -> 97 on metacritic based on 77 and 88 reviews.

TLOU -> 95 on metacritic based on 94 reviews.

mario galaxy 1 -> 97.64 on gamerankings based on 78 reviews

mario galaxy 2 -> 97.35 on gamerankings based on 56 reviews

TLOUS -> 95.05 on gamerankings based on 65 reviews

Can we please stop with this game of the generation nonsense, if you prefer the game that's great. If it's your favorite game of the generation that's great. If you disagree with some of the reviews that's your problem. But Mario galaxy 1 and 2 are ranked higher on both gamerankings and metacritic, so as of right now mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation, end of story.


If you are going by score Grand theft auto is the game of the gen, but again you and everyone else know that games releaseed earlier in the gen have a higher chance of getting rated higher, a 95 for The Last of Us even with the troll reviews that mario galaxy didn't have to deal with like quarter to 3 with 6/10 means it would be a 97-98 easily 3 years ago. So the praise of game of the gen is easily justified when it was released at the end of the gen with such good reviews.

Grand theft auto 4 has a 97.04% on gamerankings based on 60 reviews.

So since Mario galaxy is number 2 on metacritic and number 1 on gamerankings

while grandtheft auto is 3rd on gamerankings and 1 on metacritic, based on average mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation.

So your argument is invalid.  

Like I originally said, if you don't like the review, that's your problem.  Quarter to 3 didn't like the gameplay, so they gave it a bad review, but even without that bad review, mario galaxy 1 and 2 are still ranked higher.  

Also games generally get higher reviews towards the end of it's lifecycle simply because they stop innovating.  Just fixing obvious issue's won't getyou goty awards.  So no, TLOU's reviews aren't justified, if they want to be game of the generation then they have to innovate just as much as mario galaxy did, which they did not.


MY argument is not invalid at all. Grand theft auto is higher so my argument still stands, plus games do not get scored higher at the end of a gen, idk how you even think that is true. TLOU reviews are completely justified and plz saying mario galaxy did some amazing innovate stuff is laughable, I beat it and it was the same old mario gameplay and story. Oh and defending Quarter to 3 when they completely score opposite to every other reviewer is pathetic, I guess halo 4 is a 2/10 while star wars pinball is a 10/10. Your argument is very weak.



Why do you people even reply to these threads?

... damn it ... !



 

The PS5 Exists. 


veritaz said:
JakDaSnack said:
veritaz said:
JakDaSnack said:
mario galaxy 1 and 2 -> 97 on metacritic based on 77 and 88 reviews.

TLOU -> 95 on metacritic based on 94 reviews.

mario galaxy 1 -> 97.64 on gamerankings based on 78 reviews

mario galaxy 2 -> 97.35 on gamerankings based on 56 reviews

TLOUS -> 95.05 on gamerankings based on 65 reviews

Can we please stop with this game of the generation nonsense, if you prefer the game that's great. If it's your favorite game of the generation that's great. If you disagree with some of the reviews that's your problem. But Mario galaxy 1 and 2 are ranked higher on both gamerankings and metacritic, so as of right now mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation, end of story.


If you are going by score Grand theft auto is the game of the gen, but again you and everyone else know that games releaseed earlier in the gen have a higher chance of getting rated higher, a 95 for The Last of Us even with the troll reviews that mario galaxy didn't have to deal with like quarter to 3 with 6/10 means it would be a 97-98 easily 3 years ago. So the praise of game of the gen is easily justified when it was released at the end of the gen with such good reviews.

Grand theft auto 4 has a 97.04% on gamerankings based on 60 reviews.

So since Mario galaxy is number 2 on metacritic and number 1 on gamerankings

while grandtheft auto is 3rd on gamerankings and 1 on metacritic, based on average mario galaxy 1 is the game of the generation.

So your argument is invalid.  

Like I originally said, if you don't like the review, that's your problem.  Quarter to 3 didn't like the gameplay, so they gave it a bad review, but even without that bad review, mario galaxy 1 and 2 are still ranked higher.  

Also games generally get higher reviews towards the end of it's lifecycle simply because they stop innovating.  Just fixing obvious issue's won't getyou goty awards.  So no, TLOU's reviews aren't justified, if they want to be game of the generation then they have to innovate just as much as mario galaxy did, which they did not.


MY argument is not invalid at all. Grand theft auto is higher so my argument still stands, plus games do not get scored higher at the end of a gen, idk how you even think that is true. TLOU reviews are completely justified and plz saying mario galaxy did some amazing innovate stuff is laughable, I beat it and it was the same old mario gameplay and story. Oh and defending Quarter to 3 when they completely score opposite to every other reviewer is pathetic, I guess halo 4 is a 2/10 while star wars pinball is a 10/10. Your argument is very weak.

Oh so we are now ignoring the part where Mario galaxy is ranked higher than Grand theft auto Okie dokie.  And I meant lower, I was typing fast...oh and your comments about mario galaxy are extremely opinionated and laughable, I could make the exact same comments about TLOU.  And you also missed the part where I said that even without QUARTER 3 mario galaxy is still ranked higher...sigh...some people.  You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, I think we are done here, good day.



Something...Something...Games...Something