By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Reggie Fils-Aime interviewed by Forbes: "Nintendo Can Win The Video Game War"

Wright said:
Deyon said:
Wright said:

Well, the won the seventh generation...

What does that supposed to mean? Sony dominated the 6th gen console war and they got murdered in the 7th gen.


How can being second is "murdered"?


They dropped from a distant first to last place for almost the entire generation. It is not even really significant that they managed to tie it up with the second place guy when the generation is practically over.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network
Jumpin said:
Wright said:
Deyon said:
Wright said:

Well, the won the seventh generation...

What does that supposed to mean? Sony dominated the 6th gen console war and they got murdered in the 7th gen.


How can being second is "murdered"?


They were last place for almost the entire generation. It is not really significant that they managed to tie it up when the generation is practically over.

"managed to tie it up when the generation is practially over" means in my book that they did something to gain the consumer's favor.



NintendoPie said:
That is the actual title for the Forbes video?... Sounds more like a Forum attention-catcher.

It's nice to see Nintendo being more like they were with the beginning of last generation, though. Doing it their own is a good way.


Agreed. I'm glad that Nin... that Nintendo is... that is...there... who is that in your avatar?

 

Ahem... Hopefully Nintendo manages to turn the Wii U around - I really like the controller!



RolStoppable said:
Nintendo cannot win the war, because the video game industry will ensure that Nintendo doesn't. But obviously Reggie isn't going to say that Nintendo is doomed to be an also-ran when the X1 and PS4 haven't even launched yet.

Nintendo could win by declaring war on the video game industry, but that ship has sailed, because the Wii U has already been launched.


This is such a great statement, I just wanted it highlighted. In case others don't get what it is you are saying. I may be pressumptuous to give examples, but here goes any way.

Wii was a war on the GI as was the original NES. The Wii U seems like an appeasement from Nintendo to the GI 'please like me' and that is unfortunate.



Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:


If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.

If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.

wfz said:


Agreed. I'm glad that Nin... that Nintendo is... that is...there... who is that in your avatar?

 

Ahem... Hopefully Nintendo manages to turn the Wii U around - I really like the controller!

Her name is Jessica. From SNSD.

Anyhow, I think the controller is part of the reason Nintendo is held back from the position of Generation Leader. Not that it's bad (because I kind of like it), it's just odd and the fact that it adds so much to the price of the Wii U isn't helping. 



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Nintendo cannot win the war, because the video game industry will ensure that Nintendo doesn't. But obviously Reggie isn't going to say that Nintendo is doomed to be an also-ran when the X1 and PS4 haven't even launched yet.

Nintendo could win by declaring war on the video game industry, but that ship has sailed, because the Wii U has already been launched.


Thats Maelstrom talking. It isnt entirely true. In the case of WiiU, its a matter of the GI not wanting Nintendo to have too much marketshare. The GI wants an environment where everything is more competitive among platform holders, which is in their best interest for obvious reasons.

I can assure you that EA and most other 3rd parties will be all over the WiiU as soon as MS and Sony have released their respective consoles. Afterall, with Nintendo dominant - who's going to moneyhat the GI for hundreds of millions of dollars?



No. What they really want is to force Nintendo into the position MS and Sony find themselves in. They want Nintendo to bend over, just as MS and Sony is bending over. That's really all there is to it.

 



Nintendo has never succeeded on the back of 3rd parties and never will. This talk about Nintendo versus the game industry is irrelevant.

Nintendo has always won on account of its games and price, and that will never ever change. With the U, they are following the handheld strategy, and they will win again.



Incubi said:

No. What they really want is to force Nintendo into the position MS and Sony find themselves in. They want Nintendo to bend over, just as MS and Sony is bending over. That's really all there is to it.

 


What do you mean by that?



Don’t follow the hype, follow the games

— 

Here a little quote I want for those to keep memorize in your head for this coming next gen.                            

 By: Suke

Let me give you a hint:

The GI "loves" whomever platform holder that gives them the most $ during a transition period. Nintendo gives them peanuts compared to Sony and Microsoft. Thats why they "hate" Nintendo. But in 2012 Nintendo had lots of $. The GI was very, very positive about the WiiU as it expected Nintendo to "share" its wealth. Nintendo did'nt. The GI was infuriated and penalties had to be issued. Result? january to july 2013.