By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

the-pi-guy said:
JEMC said:

Given that we don't know if PS VR 2 could end working on PC, I don't think it's too off-topic... yet. After all, the controllers work on PC and Sony is now porting its games so, why not supporting to device on PC to sell its VR headset and games on PC too?

But, on the topic at hand, I agree that it's not a smart move from Sony. If those games were supported, early buyers would have a bigger catalog to try, specially newcomers to the PS VR ecosystem. And while the tracking system may be different, they could still allow developers to work on updates that would allow the games to use the new tracking methods, giving them a second life.

It's a missed opportunity.

The tracking system isn't an issue.  

That's what happens for only reading the headline and not the full article.

the-pi-guy said:

The big challenge is the Move controllers have more buttons than the new controllers. 

From the sounds of it, Sony is pushing updates to support the new headset. 

You can't deny that the excuse of lack of buttons is, at the least, quite funny when talking about VR.

In any case, I hope they manage to convince publishers to do it, and they should lead by example with their own titles.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Around the Network
Chazore said:
JEMC said:

For me, the biggest WTF revelation is that Nvidia doesn't tell its partners how much the chips cost before the reveal conference.

I mean, not telling them the launch price of the cards is one (shitty) thing, but going as far as not telling them how much they'll have to pay for the chips, giving them only an estimation while they design their cards, is insane.

That also fucks me up, mainly because they are all meant to be partners in this business venture, not silent and distant rivals, and Nvidia is pretty much disregarding the rest of the vendors the way it does, tells us that they consider all it's vendor partners as such, which doesn't make for a good business partnership.

This is like how Disney has stopped trying to work with others and instead opted to buy whatever it wants up, make their own Streaming channel and ignore everything else. Nvidia knows they are the main supplier for all the vendors they do business with, so that's likely why they allowed this fall-through to happen and still not give a shit about EVGA wanting to pull out of the market. 

Sad thing is, this could happen to the rest, and Nvidia would still probably be fine with selling the cards by themselves, I mean that GN video points out that the vendors are losing out in terms of pricing vs what Nvidia prices at, so that tells us that Nvidia isn't concerned that they are undercutting their own partners in the same market. 

Ngl, this just makes Nvidia toxic, like in business, pricing and company image. We've already seen them give us the middle finger for 2 yrs and only now come grovelling back to the customer, but at the same time they seem perfectly fine fobbing off EVGA.

Like I get that EVGA isn't entirely competent, going by their history, but Nvidia is still largely the one at fault (undercutting their partners, withholding information till the last moment when it benefits & suits them, etc).

I agree, Nvidia doesn't see its AIB as partners, but more as leeches that benefit from their work and make a money that Nvidia believes should go to them. It's certainly not the best environment for its partners when you know that you're not welcome, and you're only allowed to work for them (not with them) because they can't do it by themselves. At least not yet.

On a related note, I'd like to know how AMD behaves in these matters with its partners. To know if they're as bad as Nvidia or if they're a little less insane. I'd have the same curiosity about Intel but, given that it's a newcommer, I don't think they've had the opportunity to behave like jerks.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

I think AMD behaves better with their partners out of necessity rather than actually wanting to. The AIBs most likely get better margins because Radeon GPUs are not able to sell the volumtes that Nvidia GPUs are able to sell. Plus AMD is trying to get into the laptop and OEM markets instead of focusing on DIY so they need to have as good of a relation as possible. But I think if they get to the top, they will act similarly to Nvidia. We see this with many other tech brands such as Apple and Tesla and their distaste of anything outside of what they authorize.

And yea, Nvidia really doesn't care much about their AIB partners. I think Nvidia understands that people choose if they want to go Nvidia or Radeon first and then choose an AIB partner than choosing the AIB brand first and then choosing Nvidia or AMD. There are some that if Evga were to go to AMD would follow but thats the very little minority. Most people aren't willing to give up the wealth of features that Nvidia provides over their competition and Nvidia knows that.

The only way Nvidia will change is if they lose. Radeon or Arc really needs to hit Nvidias pride and out perform them in both Raster and Ray Tracing. If they can do that, I think Nvidia's tone could start to change. But if Nvidia keeps winning, they won't change their tone. And as a consumer, there isn't much reason for me to get Radeon or Arc if they aren't better because at the end of the day, all three are shitty companies. Just Nvidia is shittier cause they haven't lost in a long long time.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

the-pi-guy said:

The tracking system isn't an issue.  

The big challenge is the Move controllers have more buttons than the new controllers. 

That shouldn't be a big problem.

In most PSVR games with move controller support, the commands of the face buttons of both controllers were the same.
So there was no differentiation of the two cross-buttons, of the two square-buttons, of the two triangle-buttons or of the two circle-buttons.

Only the trigger and the move button of the left and right move controller sent different commands.

F.e. Blood & Truth https://userguides.eu.playstation.com/en/blood-truth/

Some games used the face buttons of the left move controller as directional buttons... these four commands can of course easily mapped to the thumbstick of the left PSVR2 controller:

https://www.ubisoft.com/en-us/help/space-junkies/gameplay/article/ps4-move-controls-for-space-junkies/000062804

Also don't forget the clickable thumb-sticks L3 + R3 of the PSVR2 controllers which can be mapped.

Last edited by Conina - on 18 September 2022

Captain_Yuri said:

I think AMD behaves better with their partners out of necessity rather than actually wanting to. The AIBs most likely get better margins because Radeon GPUs are not able to sell the volumtes that Nvidia GPUs are able to sell. Plus AMD is trying to get into the laptop and OEM markets instead of focusing on DIY so they need to have as good of a relation as possible. But I think if they get to the top, they will act similarly to Nvidia. We see this with many other tech brands such as Apple and Tesla and their distaste of anything outside of what they authorize.

And yea, Nvidia really doesn't care much about their AIB partners. I think Nvidia understands that people choose if they want to go Nvidia or Radeon first and then choose an AIB partner than choosing the AIB brand first and then choosing Nvidia or AMD. There are some that if Evga were to go to AMD would follow but thats the very little minority. Most people aren't willing to give up the wealth of features that Nvidia provides over their competition and Nvidia knows that.

The only way Nvidia will change is if they lose. Radeon or Arc really needs to hit Nvidias pride and out perform them in both Raster and Ray Tracing. If they can do that, I think Nvidia's tone could start to change. But if Nvidia keeps winning, they won't change their tone. And as a consumer, there isn't much reason for me to get Radeon or Arc if they aren't better because at the end of the day, all three are shitty companies. Just Nvidia is shittier cause they haven't lost in a long long time.

I agree with you, even if I don't think AMD would go as far as Nvidia does. Sure, they could try to get a bigger cut of the pie, but AMD has shown many times that they're aren't too keen on making a lot of reference cards/coolers,. I don't realy see them going for a Founders Edition situation like Nvidia is doing right now.

And, as for Intel, they have shown time and time again that they barely care about their CPU coolers. With that in mind, I can't see them putting a lot of effort or energy on making reference cards even if they happened to dominate the GPU business as well.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Around the Network
the-pi-guy said:

The possible solutions are basically:

- mapping multiple buttons to the stick (the issue here is that any default mapping wouldn't work for every game. A problematic one would be Skyrim)

Not very problematic because they already remapped it for the PC version of Skyrim VR:

The PSVR2 controllers have a similar stick-button layout.

The same goes for almost all multiplattform VR titles.





                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

lol



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Captain_Yuri said:

I think AMD behaves better with their partners out of necessity rather than actually wanting to. The AIBs most likely get better margins because Radeon GPUs are not able to sell the volumtes that Nvidia GPUs are able to sell. Plus AMD is trying to get into the laptop and OEM markets instead of focusing on DIY so they need to have as good of a relation as possible. But I think if they get to the top, they will act similarly to Nvidia. We see this with many other tech brands such as Apple and Tesla and their distaste of anything outside of what they authorize.

And yea, Nvidia really doesn't care much about their AIB partners. I think Nvidia understands that people choose if they want to go Nvidia or Radeon first and then choose an AIB partner than choosing the AIB brand first and then choosing Nvidia or AMD. There are some that if Evga were to go to AMD would follow but thats the very little minority. Most people aren't willing to give up the wealth of features that Nvidia provides over their competition and Nvidia knows that.

The only way Nvidia will change is if they lose. Radeon or Arc really needs to hit Nvidias pride and out perform them in both Raster and Ray Tracing. If they can do that, I think Nvidia's tone could start to change. But if Nvidia keeps winning, they won't change their tone. And as a consumer, there isn't much reason for me to get Radeon or Arc if they aren't better because at the end of the day, all three are shitty companies. Just Nvidia is shittier cause they haven't lost in a long long time.

Historically, it was both. Now under Su, I think you might be right.

While Dr. Lisa Su brought AMD to the forefront again, she also raised prices and roughed deals much more than any or her predecessors did.

So yeah, she's more generous because she has to in this case. Which also is part of the reason as to why making smaller chips than NVidia is important for them: The extra money for the AIB partners needs to come somewhere, and they can't really go higher than NVidia in their prices, so they need to cut costs somewhere.



Hem hem the apple of gaming, minor upgrades over a few years get top dolla laugh at the sheep



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.