Just because they're all clocked at 80MHZ doesn't mean they're in the same class, PS4 and Xbox One both have many more cores in them than the Wii U's GPU, which translates to better power. MHZ doesn't measure power at all, it measures the cores speed and nothing more, and the PS4 has 7GB of more RAM than Wii U for games, and Xbox One has 5GB for games, Indie games and Killzone: Shadowfall both use multiple GB's of RAM for textures alone, look at the Shadowfall breakdown, and Blow pretty much made it apparent that the Witness would be IMPOSSIBLE for Wii U.

The PS4's GPU is capable of taking tasks the CPU normally would, so your GPGPU argument is pretty pointless. It seems you know alot about the Wii U's hardware but don't know shit about PS4's and Xbox One's, which is bullshit and quite frankly it angers me that you're spreading bullshit.

I've seen gameplay of Infamous and Killzone, I'm not in the least dissapointed by the visual gap. 

You can't compare games without giving boundaries to what you can compare, because different genres are naturally more taxing on a system than others.  An open-world game is much more taxing than a closed-environement corridor crawling game.  Because of that, one game can "look" better, but when I say "visually" better I mean you can see some of the things that would make it better than a similar game on the opposing system (PS360).

see a diffrence now bet PS3 and PS4? 

My point still stands. 

I find it funny that you really think you have the authority to say that and expect anyone to believe you?

What the f does anything have to do with authority ? There are currently no U games that look better than the best of PS360. You can choose to believe whatever you want, that fact remains true.

What the f does anything have to do with authority ? There are currently no U games that look better than the best of PS360. You can choose to believe whatever you want, that fact remains true.

That's an opinion, not a fact.