Kresnik said:
|
Yeah, I get that but I was meaning in general as opposed to in the context of this thread 
I hope the Vita does well. Need to justify that purchase!
Kresnik said:
|
Yeah, I get that but I was meaning in general as opposed to in the context of this thread 
I hope the Vita does well. Need to justify that purchase!
Sure there were games, but none that really grabbed my attention. I'll keep on hoping for games to finally show up on this little handheld of mine (FF Type 0 please!!) until Sony drops support entirely.
They need to drop the memory card prices already. I want to buy some PS1 classics damn it!
ot just forum dwellers, it got praise from journalists and analysts as well. I'm talking specifically about after its E3 reveal. Aside: If consumers are easily swayed by a price cut I think that says a lot more about consumers than anything else. You say the Vita lacks "system sellers" I see people say that all the time but what exactly does that mean? Do we mean big block busters that shows of a console's feature Or shows you why a console is unique? Uncharted GA did that Do you mean a well known franchise that has a huge following? COD: classified and AssCreed had those And that's just naming 3 games. There is no defining checklist of what makes a system seller. So people keep saying "It lacks system sellers" makes no sense. The Vita has a huge library of games that caters to every taste, from "system sellers" to "AAA" to yearly releases, to Indies, to mobile but yet, no one is buying it. The Vita could come tomorrow with a £25 price cut, people will still ignore it. I still see this arguement with the PS3, the ps3 costs about half what it did when it launched and has more games than sense, yet people still say: "I'll get when after a price cut." "Or, I'll get one when Last Guardian/Agent/Versus comes out." Completely forgetting the rediculously large library of games that came out before. The hardware is good, the library is good, the price is good. yet people still choose to ignore it. At what point, do we turn to the consumers and say "Seriously people, what the hell is going on?" Blaming Sony and the game devs/publishers etc is easy but the consumers play just as big a part as the |
I think the type of games it needs are the ones that made PSP big, it needs an exclusive God of War, Grand Theft Auto, Metal Gear Solid, Final Fantasy, Gran Turismo. Also a price cut to $199 and cheaper memory cards.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.
the_dengle said:
You obviously meant to continue spewing the lies we've been hearing for the past two months about Nintendo's E3 presence.
|
Wtf?
Sony's mistake was for the Vita not to follow the strenght of the PSP. The PSP was a bastion of JRPG when there was a huge drought on the consoles but Sony went the western route and failed to secure Monster Hunter. This strategy hurt the Vita as much as the price of those d@mn memory cards.
I never regretted having a Vita but unless Sony helps in localizing those Japanese games that has a western market. It may not capture the market that the PSP enjoyed.

| Ajescent said: My arguement is always the same, how can Sony give consumers what they want, if the consumers don't know what it wants. |
i know what i want, thats why i buy Sony and Nintendo products. thats what i want
Well so far they haven't exactly helped their cause in pushing the Vita. I'm literally on the verge of selling mine, but I can't shake this feeling that something good like Final Fantasy Type-O is going to get announced for US release.