and as usual has no idea what he's talking about and has massive typo issues, just leave it be.

trolling the bad way, dont feed the troll :)

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags

yea i have no idea what, i'm talikng about, except i been right on everything.

oh LOL! That's so horrible!! I'm kinda sad and entertained at the same time :P

Only you are still wrong on most things you've presented with no facts backing you up, and instead you use rumor and speculation as always from an "anonymous dev" and even more speculation from people posting on the internet with no identity of your own while using word like "confirmed" with them without official confirmation from Nintendo while twisting your post to a degree which as usual, make Beyond3D and GAF people look bad due to your ignorance. What the hell man? I suggest going back to school or study harder if you are still in school. You get -100 points for logic and critical thinking.

@Bolded: That's actually true!

Yeah, I agree... that EA engineer sure was childish...

I thought you were laying out a rhetorical question to me, that obviously I couldn't answer.

I was basically just saying, the guy has a technical background so he'd have used that knowledge ot make the untechnical sounding statement.

Everyone else was doing the character assasination thing.

Not sure why hypocritical, I was just making a differential between character assasination -> technical assessment.

Trouble with how things are these days, people in a professional position can't give their true off the cuff opinion on anything. He doesn't work for PR, people should welcome the open voice.

Let's face it, even if Criterion hadn't produced a better NFS:MW and DF hadn't verified it as slightly technically suprerior, the same people would be calling this guy incompetent purely because he's insulting a games console. I can't exactly prove that, but the knee jerk reaction most posts here reek of is just silly and smells of "I hate EA".

*I'm not and wasn't calling you childish, it was one supposition that could explain the posts of the nature denouncing the guy. Just saying, on the one hand you have a guy who has rudely voiced his opinion based on technical background, then on the other you have forum members on VGChartz who for the most part are baselessly, using no reasoning whatsoever to call this guy incompetent.

Granted, later on people referred to Criterion - even that isn't accurate though, since Criterion has a vested interest and any of their opinions can't be used to counter a "real world" comment. The only evidence worth anything to counter is the DF analysis of NFS:MW which validates Criteron's claims. Still, that's one developer and one game.

Is that enough to say this guy is talking out his arse?...Maybe it is, but I take exception to the fact most were saying this without even thinking of the word "Criteron" as can be seen by a quick scan through the comments. Some people talking like HE was upset or angry!?

So yeah, it is defensive. It's much better to be analytical about all this.

...Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh. ;)

Except Most Wanted U is only ever so slightly better looking on the Wii-U.

Like some multiplats look ever so slightly better on the Xbox 360 vs PS3. It's well known the PS3 produces the best graphical exclusives. The "Most Wanted situation" isn't substantial proof of anything, just generally that it's in the same ball park area of power as an Xbox 360 or PS3. You show a game with substantially improved textures, particle effects, resolution and physics effects Vs the PS3/Xbox 360 version then people start becoming believers.