sales2099 said:
Ok I see what you are saying. Playing the "im filtering this thread" card a bit much but w/e. Its your thread. The franchise vs franchise posts if anything are just to keep the GT fans in line from developing a oversized hubris. But nm. Your last line intrigued me......I wouldn't be surprised at all since GT is a 10+ million seller franchise per mainline game. Your selling GT a bit short. Its main weakness is lack of release, not sales per game.
|
Not my thread actually.
Here's the way I see it. There's two methods that people can take to try to downplay GT or GT5.
A - They can say Halo is much bigger than GT, and this is more important than GT5 > Reach; or
B - They can say Halo and GT are about equal, so this isn't surprising. (looks like you stand here)
Either way, they would fail. If Halo is much bigger than GT, then it's very surprising that GT5 outsold Reach, so this is an impressive feat. If Halo & GT are about equal, then you would succeed in downplaying the significance of GT5 outselling Reach, but you would also be inadvertantly admitting that GT is as big as Halo, which many people are incapable of doing. So it's a lose-lose situation.
I find your last sentence interesting:
"Its main weakness is lack of release, not sales per game. "
This is something many people who downplay the success of GT have trouble admitting.
As for this:
"The franchise vs franchise posts if anything are just to keep the GT fans in line from developing a oversized hubris. "
What a lame cop out. Bring up some slightly related topic in any other thread just to give your brand an advantage would be seen as an obvious effort at downplaying, yet why is it encouraged here? And your point is weak anyway, since those posts were made well before any "obersized hubris" posts were made. It was just a clear case of damage control.