I'll rephrase it to avoid confusion: majority are against adoption by gay couples -- people tend to distinguish these two things, but one implies another. It says that 56% are against adoption and rising since the start of the pro-gay marriage campaign.

1. Religion does not have a monopoly on the term marriage, it's simply a worldwide cultural ceremony that can include God, or not.

2. Agree - there should be no discrimination here. Polygamists/Hetero/Homo should all be encompassed in the legal definition for marriage. I'd even support siblings who want to marry even though I'm repulsed by that idea. It should read "...between two or more humans." 

I'm not "talking against facts," I'm bringing them to the table. This is where scientists believe the fundamental control occurs. 

Epigenetics and hormones go hand in hand and it is absolutely thought to be hormones sent as epigenetic signals during development that produces sexuality. Epigenetics aren't set in stone, they are environmentally impacted. 

Classifying homosexuality as a brain disorder is absurd. Call it a recessive disposition, but disorder in this sense is a pejorative. Like I said, it's not thought of as different to left-handedness - and I think you'll fail to classify this as a disorder. 

Furthermore, what the hell does "hope" have anything to do with anything? I'm not homosexual, so I've no vested interest in a scientific explanation. I'm bringing clarity to an outdated opinion that it's a brain disorder. It simply isn't; any other assertion is baseless and, quite frankly, ridiculous.

i personally dont beleive they should have the same marriage as straight couples, not for religious reasons just that it simply violates the laws of nature, if it were meant to be so then gay couples would be able to procreate A sexually wich they cannot, allowing them to have the same marriage type implies they are the same when they clearly are not and most aknowledge that fact but thats just my opinion,

Your opinion is wrong, and you should accept that your opinion is wrong. There is no opinion on the matter of whether or not it's natural to have sex with the same sex, if the person feels that natural need to fuck another girl if that person is a she, then it's nature.

sooooo a woman who can't have child should nt be able to mary in your opinion ?  the problem in this debate is opinion. you can't use opinion to defend the point of view. 

you have to be litterally neutral to the fact. 

too much big decision are debate on religious base or opinion, hiding the fact behind those.

in some state it was illegal for white and black people to mary each other till the early 80's, and do you think it was based on fact or opinion ? 

your comment really is quite bizzare, so you are supreme ruler and decide who is right and wrong? you sound like a dicktator, being gay is fine if people want to do that it is there choice, but i will not lie and bend to peoples will just because its cool to be gay. it is not natural if all where to be so then u wouldnt be here nor i or anyone else, the laws of nature dictate that masculine and femine are required to procreate that is all, 

Such a shame. All this does is encourage them.

What's worse is that so many people are approving of it. The worlds turning into such a mess.

none of my points are that of religion im not a christian, not sure why u bring that into it maybe you have a strong hatred of religion?