By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Is $500 too much?

 

$500 for a game system is...

OK. 66 13.31%
 
I will pay anything for Halo! 11 2.22%
 
I will pay anything for Sony! 59 11.90%
 
OK for launch, but it better come down quick! 97 19.56%
 
Too Much!! 263 53.02%
 
Total:496

$500 is fine for me as a investment from buying the xbox near launch and the 360 one month after launch. But for $500 it has to be backwards and offer some really good must have features, otherwise $400 is the price point for me as well as many others, though they might prefer $300 or $350.

Speaking of which, I bought my 3DS at $130, and honestly anything above $200 is WAY too much for a portable system.



It's just that simple.

Around the Network
sergiodaly said:
curl-6 said:
sergiodaly said:
i really don't understand gamers...
people is always talking about power, graphics, features, innovative gameplay, etc etc etc... but the time comes to put the money where your mouth is... they come here saying $xxx is too much, if the tech, OS features, games through the years, all that work with services, are there, why is it to much?
will give you some examples on how your views are clouded... a flagship smartphone cost manufacturers no more than 60% of the price tag, yet consoles must not be priced higher than manufacture cost... uhhh??? yes, thats right... does it make sense??? not to me. other examples, based on some other hobbies people have, i have 4 or 5 friends that have cycling as a hobby, do anyone know how much does their bike cost? i know a few car tunning dudes, dont get me started on this subject... movie collectors, music lovers with endless album collections, pot smokers... the list goes on and on...


now... is $500 too much? $100 per year on HW is dirty cheap for this hobby...

My views are not clouded.

I don't spend large sums of money on cycling, or cars, or pot. If other people choose to do so, that doesn't mean I should have to as well.

$400 is the maximum reasonable price for a video game console in my view; if it's more than that then its almost certainly asking me to pay for extra fatures I neither want nor need.

i am sorry but i disagree @bold, not that i am accusing you of anything, some people just don't realize, some don't want to see, some are stubborn in their ways... its a legit situation for anyone to be in sometime in life.
i was pointing out that people spend money on things they like... how much? not large sums, it is as much as they can to be able to do these things they like with much more comfort, pleasure, you name it...
if you can't spend more than $400... that is ok... but choosing to not pay more than $400 is just saying you don't like gaming that much and that you are fine in being in the low end of gaming forever, and that console manufactures must sell HW at loss or near it... selling HW at loss will only make consoles last less because if there is no gain, there will not be much effort in making them...

question to you... do you put these maximum prices on everything? cars? no more than 20k? more than 20k is features and extras you don't want or need? laptop? no more than $500 because there will be features and extras you don't want or need? smart phone? no more than $300 cause will have  features and extras you don't want or need? see where i am going with this?

to me this is organic, i pay if i feel its worth... reread my last sentence in the previous post.

If those cars, laptops, smartphones, etc had their prices inflated by things I don't need, then yes. I didn't pay $599 for a PS3 because I didn't want or need Blu Ray, so I didn't want to pay for it.

I have financial responsibilities that extend beyond gaming.

I don't see any reason for a console to be more than $400. That's enough for it to be sufficiently featured and still turn a profit.



richardhutnik said:

I read the survey as what is viable for sales, not what people would pay indivdually.  It is highly presumpted for a gamer to presume that people have the same values as they do.  Unless you are arguing people should take up videogaming as a hobby (even giving up other hobbies) because it cheaper, the argument is whether or not a $500 console is too much for people.  The answer to that is very much yes.  Early adopter prices are usually far more expensive than the price of the masses pay.  And the cost of a console is also a cost of a TV to.  And with XBox a subscription, and then factor in the cost of games.  For a console to be worth it at $500 it needs to do more than just a single game.  So your initial cost estimate is much higher.

what i was trying to say is simple... most hobbies cost money to do/enjoy.

gaming is not different and expecting console manufactures to take loss or sell @ manufacture cost is not reasonable but it is what is asked here all the time. Mass market price is smaller than the $500 here is discution, but people that can wait for that price to come aren't into this hobby as others, it depends on how deep you are into the hobby... my thing with gamers is, i see them here asking for console with lots of features, fast menus, good looking graphics, in sumary they want it all but the don't want to pay for it.



Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4

If $500+ was too much in 2006 it is too much currently.



curl-6 said:

If those cars, laptops, smartphones, etc had their prices inflated by things I don't need, then yes. I didn't pay $599 for a PS3 because I didn't want or need Blu Ray, so I didn't want to pay for it.

I have financial responsibilities that extend beyond gaming.

I don't see any reason for a console to be more than $400. That's enough for it to be sufficiently featured and still turn a profit.

ok, now you are putting your reasons in a way i do understand... you didn't do that before. yet need is subjective.
not that sony need defense, because they did nothing wrong, but BR players did cost more than that back in 2006. but you as a gamer, have the right to not want it. OK fair enough.

now... in regards of Xbox 720 and PS4, you still come up front saying that $400 is max, when all the features are unveil and all of the features that make the console price go over your $400 are "games" related and you for some reason can't see you live without them for the next generation, will you pay more?

i just find odd people talking about price of things they don't know how worth they are...

@bold - same here...



Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4

Around the Network
sergiodaly said:
richardhutnik said:
 

I read the survey as what is viable for sales, not what people would pay indivdually.  It is highly presumpted for a gamer to presume that people have the same values as they do.  Unless you are arguing people should take up videogaming as a hobby (even giving up other hobbies) because it cheaper, the argument is whether or not a $500 console is too much for people.  The answer to that is very much yes.  Early adopter prices are usually far more expensive than the price of the masses pay.  And the cost of a console is also a cost of a TV to.  And with XBox a subscription, and then factor in the cost of games.  For a console to be worth it at $500 it needs to do more than just a single game.  So your initial cost estimate is much higher.

what i was trying to say is simple... most hobbies cost money to do/enjoy.

gaming is not different and expecting console manufactures to take loss or sell @ manufacture cost is not reasonable but it is what is asked here all the time. Mass market price is smaller than the $500 here is discution, but people that can wait for that price to come aren't into this hobby as others, it depends on how deep you are into the hobby... my thing with gamers is, i see them here asking for console with lots of features, fast menus, good looking graphics, in sumary they want it all but the don't want to pay for it.

To support the current model that the videogame industry has, which is to end up selling millions of copies of games, a $500 price point is not viable.  It can come out at that, but not stay there.  Sure, you can do what the 3D0 and Neo-Geo did, or heck even the PS3 ($599), but you don't move enough consoles to justify the production  costs of over $50 million to get a game done (including all costs).  It just is not sustainable.

A think about people is they want a LOT of things.  That doesn't mean they will open up the wallet and pay for it.  This is PARTICULARLY true in this era of sluggish economic growth and most people looking at wages not keeping up with inflation.



That's way too much for me. I live in a country where the average wage is much lower than in US or western Europe, so 500 Euro is a lot of money for me, that's 2/3 of the average monthly wage. This purchase hits my budget as much as a 2000 Euro purchase would hit your budget and I bet you don't think that a PS4 is worth 2k :P That's why it's not worth 500 for me. It's too much for me, I'm willing to pay no more than 200-250 Euro for a console. That's why I bought the Wii early in the gen, already own a Vita, but waited with the PS3 until a price cut and will wait for a PS4 redesign and a price cut. The only thing I'm not sure about is which console to buy first, Wii U or PS4.



Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!

My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/

My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.

richardhutnik said:
hollabackenny said:
I wonder how many people complaining about a $500 console (whether it be ps4 or 720) also own equally if not more expensive tablets or phones.

Phone and tablets, like computers, serve features people need.  A videogame console, in no shape or form does, unless you find gaming a need.  That is a key difference here.  For example, when I was looking for a portable device to be able to carry PDFs to my game designs with me, the 3DS and Vita both got ruled out as options.  The only option was a tablet.

And then, after people spend money on these devices, they feel less inclined to want to spent yet another $500 for a console.


You're right, but I would say consoles have a longer life. 360 has been around for 8 years, and ps4 for 7.  

And while there may be more use from tablets outside of the living room, that doesn't change the fact that people buy the most overpriced tablet when a MUCH cheaper and equally capable alternative is available. 



hollabackenny said:
richardhutnik said:
hollabackenny said:
I wonder how many people complaining about a $500 console (whether it be ps4 or 720) also own equally if not more expensive tablets or phones.

Phone and tablets, like computers, serve features people need.  A videogame console, in no shape or form does, unless you find gaming a need.  That is a key difference here.  For example, when I was looking for a portable device to be able to carry PDFs to my game designs with me, the 3DS and Vita both got ruled out as options.  The only option was a tablet.

And then, after people spend money on these devices, they feel less inclined to want to spent yet another $500 for a console.


You're right, but I would say consoles have a longer life. 360 has been around for 8 years, and ps4 for 7.  

And while there may be more use from tablets outside of the living room, that doesn't change the fact that people buy the most overpriced tablet when a MUCH cheaper and equally capable alternative is available. 

There is debate over whether or not tablets have been consuming PC sales.  Indications is they are.  So, people are feeling driven to get a device that is more portable for them at this point, in the form of tablets.  And with this, they then add games secondarily.  It is the gaming gets caught up into the mix of PCs now, and thus people feel less inclined to get a game console.  Another debate is whether gaming is moving out of the living room, and there is also indication of that to.  Remember, a key part of sales is the more casual side, and they are less inclined to get a dedicated device for just gaming at this point.  This day and age, the biggest gaming IP is Angry Birds.  That tells you where things have headed.



I built my PC last year for $2000, I can fork up $500 for a new console, although if rumors hold up it won't be for a xbox.