By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - RUMOR: Activision Upset at Black Ops II Wii U Sales, Says Nintendo Fans Are All Talk

ethomaz on 02 March 2013

keroncoward said:

Why the need to bundle them so early after release then? Most of them were obviously force fed to people when they bought the console for the first time. The only game that people care about in that listing is GT series. Also i noticed you didnt list the COD games among them to hide the fact that i was right. Thank you.

You said exclusives...

MW3: 13m
BOPS: 12m
MW2: 10m
BOPS2: 10m
GTAIV: 10m



Around the Network
keroncoward on 02 March 2013
Barozi said:
keroncoward said:
Barozi said:
keroncoward said:


It never was a gimped port to begin with, it was just a bunch of haters looking for anything to doom the console. I have the game and the only part i get drame dips thats noticible is during the campaign on the mission where youre running to get to the hellicopter. Its a bug cause it always slows down on that mission alone. The rest of the game is fine, the multiplayer does not get frame drops rarely lags and plays just as smooth on the screen of the controller.

Not really there are more levels with framerate problems. It dips frequently to something in the 30s.

Technically it's definitely an inferior version.


http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off


Here we go....do you own the game? NO! I own the game, played it myself and as i stated before the only part i get "noticible" framerate dips is the stage with the helicopter and it only slows down once. People are so quick to doom something they have no idea about. I like that youre using digital foundry as evidence. Same digital foundry that claimed Crysis 2 on PS3 was inferior to the Xbox360 version and it was practically the same game?

Absolute mood point. You don't need to own the game when you can see the difference in the videos.
Everything you just said is just valid for your own eyes and doesn't matter one bit in the grand scheme of things.


I hope you wouldnt mind telling me what the grand scheme of things is? Please explain to me what matters more than what i just stated as fact because i own the game?



keroncoward on 02 March 2013
ethomaz said:

keroncoward said:

Why the need to bundle them so early after release then? Most of them were obviously force fed to people when they bought the console for the first time. The only game that people care about in that listing is GT series. Also i noticed you didnt list the COD games among them to hide the fact that i was right. Thank you.

You said exclusives...

MW3: 13m
BOPS: 12m
MW2: 10m
BOPS2: 10m
GTAIV: 10m


I was doing a comparison and contrast and it seems i was absolutely right, Thank you again.



ethomaz on 02 March 2013

I'm already going out this thread but think...

1. Nintendo have a problem with third-party
2. Third-part don't want to release more games in Nintendo consoles because the sales
3. Nintendo users blame Nintendo because the third-party support

Why Nintendo users just start to support third-party games... think about that.



ethomaz on 02 March 2013

keroncoward said:

I was doing a comparison and contrast and it seems i was absolutely right, Thank you again.

I don't undertand... games sell good in PS3... third-party and first-party... in Nintendo consoles only first-party... so Nintendo fans needs to stop to blame third-party developers.

They are right to not support Nintendo consoles... that's all about business man.



Around the Network
keroncoward on 02 March 2013
ethomaz said:
I'm already going out this thread but think...

1. Nintendo have a problem with third-party
2. Third-part don't want to release more games in Nintendo consoles because the sales
3. Nintendo users blame Nintendo because the third-party support

Why Nintendo users just start to support third-party games... think about that.


I actually agree with you on this. Activision actually puts effort into their COD games on nintendo consoles to justify a buy. I think Nintendo fans should buy it instead of complaining about third party support. EA on the other hand dont deserve anything, all their games are trash and i hope no one buy their games until they get their act together.



Barozi on 02 March 2013
keroncoward said:
Barozi said:

Absolute mood point. You don't need to own the game when you can see the difference in the videos.
Everything you just said is just valid for your own eyes and doesn't matter one bit in the grand scheme of things.


I hope you wouldnt mind telling me what the grand scheme of things is? Please explain to me what matters more than what i just stated as fact because i own the game?

It is a fact. But it's only valid for you, whereas the DigitalFoundry framerate analysis is valid for 100% of the produced Black Ops 2 copies.

If all people on Earth would see the world with your eyes, everything would be alright.

Be happy that you don't notice the other framerate dips, but they are there and others can see them, so claiming that other people just want to doom the console by using valid proof, while everything you can come up with is "only" your impression is quite ironic.



Darc Requiem on 02 March 2013

If third parties want sales on Nintendo platforms they are going to have to commit. They've conditioned millions of Nintendo console owners over the past 17 years to think that third party games are crap with shoddy releases. That attitude won't change overnight. They had a golden opportunity to make inroads last generation with the Wii and they failed miserably.

A mistake I constantly see on forums is the assumption that most gamers are informed. Gamers that frequent forums are in the minority. Most gamers don't frequent forums. Nor do they follow the industry via the internet with baited breath. People need to step back and realize this.



keroncoward on 02 March 2013
Barozi said:
keroncoward said:
Barozi said:

Absolute mood point. You don't need to own the game when you can see the difference in the videos.
Everything you just said is just valid for your own eyes and doesn't matter one bit in the grand scheme of things.


I hope you wouldnt mind telling me what the grand scheme of things is? Please explain to me what matters more than what i just stated as fact because i own the game?

It is a fact. But it's only valid for you, whereas the DigitalFoundry framerate analysis is valid for 100% of the produced Black Ops 2 copies.

If all people on Earth would see the world with your eyes, everything would be alright.

Be happy that you don't notice the other framerate dips, but they are there and others can see them, so claiming that other people just want to doom the console by using valid proof, while everything you can come up with is "only" your impression is quite ironic.


LOL its about my eyes now? Something is wrong with my eyes because i own the game myself and qualify to have an opinion on its performance? I will accept my eyes have a problem only if you agree you have mental issues.....



ShadowMarshal on 02 March 2013

It's irrelevant to argue the minutia of supposed technical defects, that nobody even cares about. It's not the game, it's nintendo. It's been proven with EVERY cod game on nintendo lol.

Just stop, it's a fools errand. Anyone blaming Activision for nintendo's poor sales needs to stop. These type of discussions are rampant on the nintendo threads, ever since it became obvious as to nintendo's early demise this gen.