So you basically sayin' Playstation games are hot girls with no personality...so Nintendo's games are old lovely grannies that still treat you like a boy even though you're already a grown up then?

I rather stick with the hot girls then, they're at least fun to play with...

Don't you see? They've done everything wrong. They created a world where only the question, "How real do the boobs look?" became the defining factor for a game!

I used to be a big PlayStation fan back in the PS1 days and the Spyro games were my favorite. I felt right at home, but over time it became more and more apparent that Sony and I had to part ways. While I grew up to leave my teenager years behind me, Sony refused to do the same. For the handful of female members we have around here, let me point out the entire scope of a male teenager's brain:

1) Is she hot?
2) If yes, how hot is she?

This mindset doesn't only apply to how male teenagers perceive women, but everything else as well. While I began to look at the finer details of games, Sony was still stuck in a mentality where only superficial things really mattered. The advancement of technology became less important to me over time, because a mediocre game with pretty graphics would still be a mediocre game. I wanted my games to be great at their core, not full of distractions that covered up for an unpolished/unbalanced game. You might say that good gameplay and good graphics are not mutually exclusive and you would be right for saying this. That's why I switched to Nintendo who have the highest batting average when it comes to making games like that.

I still follow the news on Sony systems and games, but time and time again I end up being disappointed, because they are unwilling to change. The PS4 announcement wasn't an exception to this rule, but further confirmation. I hope that one day I can own a Sony system without regrets again, but until then I'll stick to Nintendo games.

Except they haven't and this is some retarded exaggeration people have conjured up.

Why do people like me and Aldro rave about Uncharted? Only because it looks nice?

Can you explain instead, because it seems that all you are rambling about is things you can't even justify.

...16.

There were 16 colssi.

Again, need I say more?

Oh, and the envioroments is part of the design, the design which is part of the games esthetics. You have dug yourself into a really deep hole.

The OP never said that PlayStation has sexist games. No wonder that there is a communication problem, if you are trying to refute points that were never made.

My point was that Nintendo makes deeper games with more balanced gameplay mechanics (thus staying relevant for years after release which is a testament to substance) and I brought up SSBB vs. PSABR as an example. You then drew nonsensical comparisons between games of different genres and didn't answer my question if you are German.

Pwahahaha, rightyo if that's how you saw reality unfolding. You compared two games of probably the most shallow genre, and then ran away when I mentioned things like SotC, Ico, Flower, Journey, Heavy Rain etc. Those games are far more involved, mature, emotionally gripping than any Nintendo game. But apparently, SSBB is the peak depth of gaming.