| Mythmaker1 said: I think some would be more charitable if the piece itself was decent. But it isn't. The research is slapdash, the figures are misleadding, and the author makes too many assumptions to justify their conclusions. |
So do many of the haters. That´s the problem. People want so badly to defend their point-of-view that they don´t care about taking misleading information to counter argumentation. Is it that hard just to indicate the points of concern about what the person wrote, instead of trying to be smart with the same mistakes ?
that´s why I say it´s a shame. Sometimes neither side is correct, the fanatical fanboyism makes people blind when discussing games, sometimes..








