Kinda hard to imagine how all this multitasking things take 4 GB of RAM. I still think this is way to much for games atm. Like disolitude was saying, Battlefield 3 on ultra takes 2 GB (someone correct me if I'm wrong). 

But either way, 4 GB is really a lot. I want to see how games (especially 1st party ones) will use all this RAM (if they ever use it all).

this

and if everythig shown last night was 4GRAM then his gen's going to do more then blow minds.

Microsoft will follow suit & up th RAM to match PS4 it's a win for gamers.

PPPPOOOOOWWWWWAAAAAAARRRRRRRR!!!!! 8gig of ram :) it was great 2 here that during the meeting.

Yea I have 16 gb of ram.  there is so much wasted ram sitting around doing nothing no matter how much shit i'm doing.

Yeah excatly...

More GPU RAM (VRAM) and you may be able to get deliver more frames per second (if you have the GPU power to push those frames out). 

But PS4 is going to hit the CPU and GPU bottleneck waay before it can utilize more than 2 GB of VRAM.

However good news here is that Killzone is supposed to be 1080p@30 fps...So this may be able to give them 60fps if VRAM and not GPU/CPU were the bottlenecks..

Lol at all these ppl hating on Sony. If your taking your time to post flaming trolling negative articles about Sony. Then your a Big L.

Does extra RAM really make that much of a difference to graphics? I thought it was for, well, other stuff....(tech ignoramus here)

No wonder Mark Rein from Epic was so excited. He seemed a bit too pumped for someone who should have known everything already.

Yeah, it's a bit silly focusing on graphics, or citing multi-platform PC games that are designed to work with a variety of settings.  The real benefit will be with other things besides how shiney a game looks.