Well of course guns aren't stopping Homicides in the US.  Once you get to the stage where you want to murder somebody, you are going to murder somebody regardless.  The US has a number of factors that make it inherently more violent then most OECD countries.  Poverty, education issues, racial minorities who often feel they can't trust the police, and are often right.  Yet our violent crime rate is lower.  I'll note once again that for white people.  The US homicde rate is right in line with europe.  Therefore the causes of our high homicide rate are logically caused by issues that effect these groups heavier then whites.  These people more likely to comit murders including gun homicides are LESS likely to own guns.

As for bogus stats... they aren't bogus.  Actually if you look historically at homicide rates.  You'll note homicdes go UP after gun bans.  Not down. 

For a very mild example.

You can't tie that to one piece of legislation,  nor would I, but the opposite happens from what you think would be the case.

http://scienceblogs.com/builtonfacts/2013/01/28/gun-control-debate-with-mark-pt-2/   (Has some good stuff on it as well).

Why?  Because it doesn't matter.  Nobody looks at a gun and says "Hey a gun, i'm gonna shoot someone!"   People think... "Man i'd like to kill that guy.  I'll shoot him"  or if there is no gun "I'll stab him" or "I'll poison him."

If we got rid of guns in the US.  Homicdes would not go down.  Crime would go up.  

If you remove the US a statistical outlier... you actually find homicides go down as gun ownership goes up in OECD nations.

I wouldn't be looking for an arguement either if my viewpoint held no statistical or logical point... to quote the above link.

"In short, there is no good evidence that gun availability causes increased crime rates. There is extremely good evidence that socioeconomic variables are far and away the primary drivers of crime rates. Violence in general and gun violence in particular are real problems in the US, but gun control as a solution is so ill-supported as to verge on superstition."

Nope just regulate them so crazy f-cks can't get them.

YOur source is no good and biased as always. Moving along.

Source. Conservatives that love guns. LOL

Do you think Conservatives would just title themselves Conservatives?  Like... no name of a group or think tank or anything?  I mean think man...

The source is the Conservative Party of the UK... (Tories)

citing figures from the EU and United Nations.

Though i'm sure you consider the EU and United Nations Conservative.  Which to be fair.  They've been pretty economically conservative... at least compaired to the US.

Though gun loving wise... I think not.

Yes, yes we should. Guns serve no purpose but to end lives.

Exactly. And who is most likely to use guns for that purpose? I'll give you a hint; It's NOT the law-abiding citizens.

And who is most likely to obey a law? I'll give you another hint; It's NOT the criminals.

Gun bans don't solve anything.

so a majority atleast want regulation.

How will regulation prevent illegal acquisition?

Regulation only makes it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to procure weapons legally. So no.

Personal responsibility must be priority one. If your kid steals your weapon, you should be at fault for not properly securing said weapon and prosecuted as an accomplice.

I'd be for legislation, not regulation.

Guns guns and guns. Sell tazers instead and get rid of guns.