By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - CD Projekt Red Give First Glimpse of Next-Gen RPG Graphics

Hmmm, not impressed by this outside of the mist. Everything else looks only a tad better then the best looking ps3 games and Halo 4. Obviously taking into account the fact that it'll probably run smoothly at 1080p, is open world and the textures will hold up under close inspection.

I need to see it in motion.

http://www.thereticule.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Halo-4-CTF-Exile-Map.jpg



Around the Network
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Have we forgotten X from the Nintendo Direct already?

Why? The game is pretty but its not a graphical powerhouse if thats what you are getting at. 


Really? on here an gaf I saw a lot of people claiming otherwise as compared to other rpgs.

Yeah, people like pretty waterfalls. Lighting and textures all just look OK. The scale is great and we should see some nice improvements before its 
released but it doesn't look anymore next gen than Red Dead or Skyrim does. 

Odd that well over 90% of the posts in the gaf thread and the one here said the exact opposite of you, well except for one guy here. Sure there was mention of bad water, etc, but that was shrugged off as this is still very early build while the rest was clearly above current gen.

People were excited, Nintendo fans were excited and gaf loves to overreact.(and no, 90% did not say it looked next gen) I guess the only real way to prove if X is a graphical powerhouse by next gen standards is to come back when Fallout 4 is out or whatever open world games we start seeing on PS4-720  and compare.



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Have we forgotten X from the Nintendo Direct already?

Why? The game is pretty but its not a graphical powerhouse if thats what you are getting at. 


Really? on here an gaf I saw a lot of people claiming otherwise as compared to other rpgs.

Yeah, people like pretty waterfalls. Lighting and textures all just look OK. The scale is great and we should see some nice improvements before its 
released but it doesn't look anymore next gen than Red Dead or Skyrim does. 

Odd that well over 90% of the posts in the gaf thread and the one here said the exact opposite of you, well except for one guy here. Sure there was mention of bad water, etc, but that was shrugged off as this is still very early build while the rest was clearly above current gen.

People were excited, Nintendo fans were excited and gaf loves to overreact.(and no, 90% did not say it looked next gen) I guess the only real way to prove if X is a graphical powerhouse by next gen standards is to come back when Fallout 4 is out or whatever open world games we start seeing on PS4-720  and compare.

C'mon man, it may not look like what you expect of next gen but it had and shoulders above Skyrim and Red Dead in terms of lighting, textures and draw distance.. It looks like a high end PC game. But yeah, I agree that I don't think that game should act as an indicator of what we'll see for ps4/720 in terms of open world RPGs. I suspect even the worst looking next gen games will be a few notches ahead of the standard we see coming from the wii U.



The most impressive looking thing in the screen shot, to me, are the textures of the ground and those trees in the background. This http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/3162/crysis2011032714560226.jpg screen shot Baron showed does NOT look better than the image shown in the OP.

edit: I should point out that I am making a few assumptions about how it will look like in motion when I say they are the most impressive looking things.



teigaga said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Have we forgotten X from the Nintendo Direct already?

Why? The game is pretty but its not a graphical powerhouse if thats what you are getting at. 


Really? on here an gaf I saw a lot of people claiming otherwise as compared to other rpgs.

Yeah, people like pretty waterfalls. Lighting and textures all just look OK. The scale is great and we should see some nice improvements before its 
released but it doesn't look anymore next gen than Red Dead or Skyrim does. 

Odd that well over 90% of the posts in the gaf thread and the one here said the exact opposite of you, well except for one guy here. Sure there was mention of bad water, etc, but that was shrugged off as this is still very early build while the rest was clearly above current gen.

People were excited, Nintendo fans were excited and gaf loves to overreact.(and no, 90% did not say it looked next gen) I guess the only real way to prove if X is a graphical powerhouse by next gen standards is to come back when Fallout 4 is out or whatever open world games we start seeing on PS4-720  and compare.

C'mon man, it may not look like what you expect of next gen but it had and shoulders above Skyrim and Red Dead in terms of lighting, textures and draw distance.. It looks like a high end PC game. But yeah, I agree that I don't think that game should act as an indicator of what we'll see for ps4/720 in terms of open world RPGs. I suspect even the worst looking next gen games will be a few notches ahead of the standard we see coming from the wii U.

Oh yeah, its ahead of Skyrim and Red dead in a lot of areas, though lighting still goes to Red Dead from what i have seen (GTA5 is even better)

The game looks nice and should get some improvements before its out. But a graphical powerhouse? Nope. 



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

Around the Network
Attoyou said:
teigaga said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Have we forgotten X from the Nintendo Direct already?

Why? The game is pretty but its not a graphical powerhouse if thats what you are getting at. 


Really? on here an gaf I saw a lot of people claiming otherwise as compared to other rpgs.

Yeah, people like pretty waterfalls. Lighting and textures all just look OK. The scale is great and we should see some nice improvements before its 
released but it doesn't look anymore next gen than Red Dead or Skyrim does. 

Odd that well over 90% of the posts in the gaf thread and the one here said the exact opposite of you, well except for one guy here. Sure there was mention of bad water, etc, but that was shrugged off as this is still very early build while the rest was clearly above current gen.

People were excited, Nintendo fans were excited and gaf loves to overreact.(and no, 90% did not say it looked next gen) I guess the only real way to prove if X is a graphical powerhouse by next gen standards is to come back when Fallout 4 is out or whatever open world games we start seeing on PS4-720  and compare.

C'mon man, it may not look like what you expect of next gen but it had and shoulders above Skyrim and Red Dead in terms of lighting, textures and draw distance.. It looks like a high end PC game. But yeah, I agree that I don't think that game should act as an indicator of what we'll see for ps4/720 in terms of open world RPGs. I suspect even the worst looking next gen games will be a few notches ahead of the standard we see coming from the wii U.

Oh yeah, its ahead of Skyrim and Red dead in a lot of areas, though lighting still goes to Red Dead from what i have seen (GTA5 is even better)

The game looks nice and should get some improvements before its out. But a graphical powerhouse? Nope. 


exactly, its not a powerhouse. Halo4, uncharted and the last of us all look better. i understand they arent open world games like RDR or skyrim but when it comes down to looks its better than X. also the lighting in RDR looks better than that in X from what i seen. but looking at GTA5 it looks like its looks better than X and thats on current gen consoles



How is anyone able to say whether this looks better or worse than Crysis or any current gen big budget title when the screenshot is so small?

Having said that, I do have faith in CDProjekt after Witcher 2.



Umm my skyrim on high setting with bleak enb looks much better than this. I'm not trying to cause arguments here but I expect a lot more from a supposedly "next gen" graphics. Still I would not make my final judgement based on this one image alone.

Look at what a PC can achieve with a simple enb mod on skyrim alone here:

http://skyrim.nexusmods.com/mods/24828
http://beautifulskyrim.yolasite.com/gallery.php
http://beautifulskyrim.yolasite.com/unreal-cinema---enb.php

And yes I can achieve those graphics on a 2 1/2 year old PC of mine.



Intel core i7 930 OC @ 4.0 ghz

XFX Double dissipation Radeon HD 7950 356 bit 3gb GDDR5 OC @ 1150 MHz core + 1575 x 4 memory

Triple channel DDR 3 12gb RAM 1600 MHz

The development kit is not the actual Playstation 4 hardware. That's not what next-gen graphics will look like.



Attoyou said:
teigaga said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Attoyou said:
superchunk said:
Have we forgotten X from the Nintendo Direct already?

Why? The game is pretty but its not a graphical powerhouse if thats what you are getting at. 


Really? on here an gaf I saw a lot of people claiming otherwise as compared to other rpgs.

Yeah, people like pretty waterfalls. Lighting and textures all just look OK. The scale is great and we should see some nice improvements before its 
released but it doesn't look anymore next gen than Red Dead or Skyrim does. 

Odd that well over 90% of the posts in the gaf thread and the one here said the exact opposite of you, well except for one guy here. Sure there was mention of bad water, etc, but that was shrugged off as this is still very early build while the rest was clearly above current gen.

People were excited, Nintendo fans were excited and gaf loves to overreact.(and no, 90% did not say it looked next gen) I guess the only real way to prove if X is a graphical powerhouse by next gen standards is to come back when Fallout 4 is out or whatever open world games we start seeing on PS4-720  and compare.

C'mon man, it may not look like what you expect of next gen but it had and shoulders above Skyrim and Red Dead in terms of lighting, textures and draw distance.. It looks like a high end PC game. But yeah, I agree that I don't think that game should act as an indicator of what we'll see for ps4/720 in terms of open world RPGs. I suspect even the worst looking next gen games will be a few notches ahead of the standard we see coming from the wii U.

Oh yeah, its ahead of Skyrim and Red dead in a lot of areas, though lighting still goes to Red Dead from what i have seen (GTA5 is even better)

The game looks nice and should get some improvements before its out. But a graphical powerhouse? Nope. 

For the consoles that are currently available? Yes! lol