| Gribble said: I can understand people not listening to nobodies like myself, but how about listening to those who know better than anyone on this site. And PLEASE, watch it all: |
Well.There is an even easier explanation for it.
If you want to pull down a building,you need several experts.
you need many weeks of calculation and you must be very accurate,because every little mistake could cause a catastrophy when you try to bring a building down,the building may shift or huge parts wont collapse.
thats the official story.
Lets suppose 911 was no inside job-than the only possibility is a demolition expert conspiracy.
They are telling us for decades that you need static engineers and demolition experts to bring down a building,because the slightest misscalculation and imbalance can make a building shift to one side.
That must be a lie.
911 has definitivly proven that you just need an impact and some kerrosin burning for a few minutes.
It doesn't matter how massive the impact is(a plane wtc 1/2) or how low (a few stones-building 7)
and it even does not matter how big the imbalance is (wtc 1 and 2 were the most imbalanced buildings ever after they were hit)
the building won't shift to one side,it will ignore all physical laws and collaps into its own footprints.
Why the hell do we still need demolition experts as we know since 911 that building are always collapsing as they should.
You just need some kerrosin burning for a few minutes and a plane.We must stop paying and using demolition experts.noone needs them and they never were needed(hope my english was good enough for some sarcasm)
if you want to go a little deeper into it,search on youtube for aaron russo(former hollywood producer and rockefeller friend,100% no conspiracy theorist)and what he is saying about 911.
