Nothing wrong with believing if it makes sense(duh?) you wanna talk about authenticity? you saying the person you voted for never lied before!? What makes the "official" narrative authentic?  it serves the interest of the pentagon, wall st, and corporations.  The greediest buttholes on the planet.  But they're version is authentic!?

the fact that you hold no positive feelings for your gov and are not a patriot means you gave up.  how can I expect you to understand?  what do you care?  I am a patriot.

The aim of patriots is to set limits to the power which the ruler should be suffered to exercise over the community; and this limitation is what is meant by liberty. It is attempted in two ways. First, by obtaining a recognition of certain immunities, called political liberties or rights, which it is to be regarded as a breach of duty in the ruler to infringe, and which, if he did infringe, specific resistance, or general rebellion, is held to be justifiable. A second expedient is the establishment of constitutional checks, by which the consent of the community, or of a body of some sort, supposed to represent its interests, was made a necessary condition to some of the more important acts of the governing power.

source: http://www.bartleby.com/130/

a simple fire cannot bring down a building like that
look im from Spain, and here we had the Windsor Hotel that had some heavy fire going on, it burned out completely for days
and the core columns resisted that with no problem, the structure was intact

that would be nice if the building was strictly on fire. However, it wasn't it sustaned massive damage from objects being expelled at 100,000psi from the other collapses. Just look at the damage the collapses caused to other buildings a lot further than a footbal field away

NightDragon83 said:




DieAppleDie said:
its freaking disturbing that our buildings fall symetrically with just an ordinary office fire going on...



Oh look, another "WHAT ABOUT BUILDING 7?!?" moron.
Did you know that bridges have collapsed just from the heat caused by crashed tanker trucks?
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Tanker_truck_fire_causes_collapse_on_Oakland_Freeway
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiehltal_bridge
So a tanker full of fuel is enough to structurally damage a freaking highway bridge to the point of collapse, but TWO 110 story towers smoldering with jet fuel and collapsing right across the street from a building isnt enough to severely damage the building's structural integrity to the point of collapse?




Using two different types of structures (which were impacted and collapsed at different angles, speed, etc) to attempt to validate your argument makes you look foolish. Calling someone a moron because your sheep like mentality is not able grasp the concept that elements in government are capable of allowing/staging false flag attacks in order to benfit politically and gain more authoritarian power is completely childish. Grow up.

Lol at 9/11 conspiracy theories. I thought people had finally dropped this crap. Reminds me of South Park, Mystery of the Urinal Deuce, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia9llb7FW0A&sns=em

look, buildings dont fall like that because of random, not uniform damage caused by shrapnel and standard fire it just doesnt make sense

Except when the damage is a completely missing chunk in a corner of the building and huge gash on its front

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_853566&feature=iv&src_vid=ymFYBijuqJw&v=7PpsCCTMP8w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_568406&feature=iv&src_vid=7PpsCCTMP8w&v=YxljFOCZ6TU

seriously, the people still going on about this are really foolish.... this guy just shows how stupid the truthers are and how idiotic they look pointing to their incomplete half assed cherry picked data and convienently ignoring important factors to contribute to the event because for some reason...

You take this man seriously and ignore hundreds and hundreds of experts, AND your own eyes? Don't you understand that YOU are the one who's believing the conspiracy theory and people who question the official line are the ones that are looking at evidence. It took one thing and one thing only to make me start investigating. Watching the first tower collapse, and then the second and then the third. At that point my intelligence was insulted, so I decided to start looking into it.  I really wish I hadn't to be honest, but unfortunately I did and there's no going back. I believe ... NO, I know it was planned. Who by is the only question I now want to know. One thing IS for sure, it wasn't who the media said it was, unless you believe in Bond villains too.

People with BAs are not experts first of all. People spewing conspiracy theories are not experts.

2nd: LOL at bolded... ironic.

3rd: Italics, yes we are in agreement.

4th: underlined, BY THE GOD DAMN TERRORIST OBVIOUSLY! LOL!!!

5th: interesting enough this guy is more of an expert than the people in your video and provides more evidence than conspiracy theorists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TELiwR0Olk&NR=1