What I think is that the plane was indeed a military plane and that when that particular part of the Pentagon was re-enforced, they put a 'marker' there for a missile to hone in on. The plane came low and fast from the North and fired the missile. It then banked over and around the Pentagon (which is why some people say they saw a military plane and also thought there was a second plane) Once they'd assumed a plane had hit the Pentagon, they obviously then assumed that the plane they saw must be a second plane, but in fact it was the plane that had fired the missile.

The reason the taxi driver got into such a pickle with his statements and the interview he did was that everything pointed to a North course (verified by many witnesses including policemen), but he was on the bridge on the South course. he then changed where his car was but no matter how many times the interviewers showed him pictures of his car on the South path and pointed out that he was stood next to it, he denied that it was him and insisted that his car wasn't on the Bridge but was in fact on the North flight path. When he thought the camera wasn't rolling he actually said that he was just a small man caught up in something big. That could mean anything of course, but it's worth watching it just to see his body language. He also claimed to have removed the lamp post from the front window of his car by himself and there was absolutely no damage to the hood of the car.

That's how I'm seeing it at the moment, but that could change of course.

He never said no one died at Pentagon.  oops, I posted again.

What I think is that the plane was indeed a military plane and that when that particular part of the Pentagon was re-enforced, they put a 'marker' there for a missile to hone in on. The plane came low and fast from the North and fired the missile. It then banked over and around the Pentagon (which is why some people say they saw a military plane and also thought there was a second plane) Once they'd assumed a plane had hit the Pentagon, they obviously then assumed that the plane they saw must be a second plane, but in fact it was the plane that had fired the missile.

Floors 4 through 9 suffered partial collapse and/or fire damage. Floors 1–3 were undamaged. Some of the collapse was due to impact from steel and debris from World Trade Center 1 (North Tower). Other collapsed sections were due to fire damage. Portions of internal collapse and burnout were found on upper floors, mainly floors 6–8. The exterior facade suffered severe fire damage. The upper floors (5–9) were on fire after the second tower collapse. A section of the fuselage allegedly from United Airlines flight 175 is claimed to have landed on the top of the building. WTC 5 was the least damaged building of the complex. The Borders bookstore was undamaged after both towers collapsed.

The last standing section of 5 WTC was removed by January 2002.

So where did flight 77 go? What happened to the passengers on that flight (including the hijackers) and what about the families of the dead from that flight?