| MeowTheMouse said: for who say that it wont be good with out rare, Ur simply saying that rare > nintendo in platformers. btw DKJB was awsome, sure it was short, i hated that its score based and the levels are short but it was a step in the right direction. "EAD Software Development Group Tokyo" was the developer of DKJB this is an other reason for me to be 100% that mario galaxy will be one of the gr8est games ever. My own personal openion is DKJB > DKC, one of the reasons why we "loved" DKC its cuz of the pre-rendered graphics. Im not saying its a bad game i loved the series but that doesnt make it better then JB. its the same with FF7, FF7 is a really good game but its certainly not the best RPG ever, but many of us say it is because its there first RPG they ever played. |
FFVII wasn't the first RPG I played and I still say it's the best. Maybe some people just like it the best? Anyway it's not saying that Rare is better than Nintendo. Mario 3 is better than any DKC game but it doesn't feel anything like DKC. DKC is what it is because of Rare, Jungle Beat wasn't really all that special in my opinion. Nintendo can make great platformers, so can Namco(Klonoa) doesn't mean I want Namco to make the next Mario game. That's how I feel about DKC. Rare does some things better than Nintendo(especially the music) that I just don't want to be without if they made DKC4.
So yeah it wouldn't be the same without Rare. It might still be good but why not just make something completely different in that case?
Oh and most of the people that worked on DKC2 are still with Rare. No need to make things up(to the guy that said most left)
