MB1025 said:
pitzy272 said: U3 HAS been massively bundled starting a couple months ago; however, before the bundling started, it was at around 4.5million, outpacing U2 by about 800k. It had also just started to pick up in sales to 20+K per week directly prior to the bundling. U2 had a 500k or so 2nd Christmas, so u can only assume U3 would've done the same or better without its bundling. So...without that bundling, U3 would likely be at around 5.05-5.20 million in sales. So it definitely would be much further from Gears 3's sales if it hadn't been bundled, but I still think these games belong in the same class, saleswise. Plus, seeing as U2 is a 6mill+ seller, and U3 was tracking nearly 1mill ahead of U2 pre-bundling, there's a decent chance U3 would've caught Gears 3 eventually even without its bundling. The only unfortunate thing is that Gears 3 still made more money due to selling more copies of Gears 3 while it was still full price. |
No one is arguing how well it sold before the bundle. The problem is the only reason it is so close to Gears of War 3 now is because of the bundles. For anyone to sit here and try to claim a victory is ignorant because they know why it is close and if the roles were reversed most on here no damn well we wouldn't here the end about how Gears of War 3 was bundled.
|
vgchartz is only an estimate also, we have official number, here in the us, gears of war 3 over 4 million in its first holiday, while uncharted was 1 million,let be realistic people, zelda sky sword was a huge bomber yet it still managed 3.6 million on the vg chartz estimate, i did'nt even see it chart, the most important thing to determine if the franshise is heallthy is to watch the first 3 month of sales.