| zero129 said: So i guess i win then and you accept that i was right max and that animals can think and are conscious just like us? been awhile now and nothing from you. bit hard to disagree with science i guess... |
Science? Some scientist articulated their personal opinion. But in science there is stated an theory in a more concrete manner. Like n a scientific paper, like the one I quoted. About chimpanzees be like humans - killing each other with weapons. On which you didn't commented. So I guess I win. It is a bit hard to disagree with science i guess... *lol*
Consciess of animals is a scientifically disputed thing - but please notice I don't kill and eat animals, that are suspected to have consciousness: apes/monkeys, doplins/whales, elephants, maybe even octopus. So, if your arguments are based on consciousness, you should restrict it to the animals that have one. Or do you think sponges have consciousness? Or Xenoturbella? Or Platyzoa? Or corals? Funny thing is, if people talk about animals they mostly think only about chordata. Maybe including insects. Animals are much more than that.
Another thing you should notice is, that you always compare animals with humans, but you never apply the same rules to animals as to humans. A shark may kill you, and soen't care if you are a vegan or not. The golden rule that is a thinking base to our ethics and also in core of our laws goes both ways: I accept them for other humans, but I also expect other humans to treat me according to the golden rule. I cannot expect the same from animals, they never consented to treat humans this way. So there IS a main difference.







