At launch? All previous consoles were on pair with the TOP PC at launch.

After that the PC became more strong with the years.

i can think of so many reasons  on what is hurting gaming industry more and that is definetly not one of them 

then prove it to me compare the 360 specs to a 2005 gaming PC

There is no point to buy a console delivering the power of a low PC at launch... after five year you have what in the hands... a console machine have to be on pair with high-end PC at launch.

actually there is a point it is what every gamer buys a console 

GAMES!!!!

The R500 GPU of 360 was the fastest and most advanced GPU in the market... only after a few months the ATI launched the R520 (Fudo) for PC... the first GPU to use Unified Sharders was the 360's GPU.

What if it has good games?

He sorta has a point in that its GPU, x1800 series R520 was on par with the best GPU, the GeForce 7800GTX, but costed more (least in December).

Now my question to ethomaz is how much did the R520 cost on PC at launch?

Currently the GTX 680 is priced at $460-$500.  Of course when bought in bulk the price can be lowered but we're looking at a GPU that will cost alonenear or more than the launch premium 360 price.  We can take a good guess that Microsoft's new console will be sold at a loss but unless they release a +$600 console with a planned GTX 680 or on par GPU the loss would be too great even for Microsoft to logically do if priced lower.

you got a point but look at PC games then compare to what the 360 launched with 

PC cpu's have not been clocked past 4.2ghz (they can be overclocked but only if they have been unlocked ie a 3570k is where as a 3550 is not), i remember around 2001/2002 when pentium 4's were being clocked to 3.6ghz however since multiple cores generate more heat with higher clock speeds the clock speeds have remained around the 3.5ghz point on desktop cpus and around 2ghz with mobile cpus.