Nsanity said:
During their time period. |
Ok....name a year and lets test this.
Nsanity said:
During their time period. |
Ok....name a year and lets test this.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Ok....name a year and lets test this. |
This pointless debate has went on long enough.
Nsanity said:
This pointless debate has went on long enough. |
Whatever, I had the 360 myself for four years and when I got the PS3 I was blown away instantly by the launch games that I played on the PS3. Thats all I am saying, on a level of art direction and more Sony gave their titles a level of love that I had not experience in my four years being 360 only. Sony needs to catch up with shooter gameplay though.
yo_john117 said:
Not surprising really.
Glad to see it got some recognition (should have gotten GOTY as well IMO) |
what got game of the year
how anyone can think Halo 4 is the pinochle of 360 graphics is beyond me, it's not even close to the top 10 xbox games graphics wise, play Far Cry 3 or Battlefield 3 if you want a 360 shooter with immense graphics, don't take fanboyism to stupid levels and talk about graphics and Halo, the only thing Halo trumps graphics wise is CoD and that's hardly difficult, at least CoD does the online properly, Halo is just for sad kids who wank and take drugs all the time cause they think it makes them more "manly" and "cool" in reality they are neither.
Forza is fair enough, racing sims tend to push the graphics boundaries pretty well.
RoryGamesFree said: how anyone can think Halo 4 is the pinochle of 360 graphics is beyond me, it's not even close to the top 10 xbox games graphics wise, play Far Cry 3 or Battlefield 3 if you want a 360 shooter with immense graphics, don't take fanboyism to stupid levels and talk about graphics and Halo, the only thing Halo trumps graphics wise is CoD and that's hardly difficult, at least CoD does the online properly, Halo is just for sad kids who wank and take drugs all the time cause they think it makes them more "manly" and "cool" in reality they are neither. Forza is fair enough, racing sims tend to push the graphics boundaries pretty well. |
http://www.thereticule.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Halo-4-CTF-Exile-Map.jpg
What an ugly game.
Reported for: "Halo is just for sad kids who wank and take drugs all the time cause they think it makes them more "manly" and "cool" in reality they are neither"
If you're wondering.
Yay!!!
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
What an ugly game. Reported for: "Halo is just for sad kids who wank and take drugs all the time cause they think it makes them more "manly" and "cool" in reality they are neither"
If you're wondering. |
I really couldn't care less what Halo fanboys think about anything, you are barely even "gamers"
RoryGamesFree said:
|
Can you atleast please justify your reasoning behind calling Halo gamers (incl me) "Fanboys", "Wankers", "Drug addicts", etc??
Yay!!!
SWORDF1SH said:
I don't think storage space on software would make any difference to graphics. Plus if it had a HD DVD drive it would of had a higher rrp which hampered the PS3 for a few years of its life. |
Even if the 360 would have came with a HD-DVD drive. Blu-ray would have still won the format wars HD-DVD would have been around a bit longer but that is about it. It would have reduced piracy by a whole lot on the 360 side though that would have been the best benefit. It would have probably delayed the launch of the console also so maybe the RROD problem wouldn't have been as big since it would have launched with slightly better hardware.
Chris Hu said:
Even if the 360 would have came with a HD-DVD drive. Blu-ray would have still won the format wars HD-DVD would have been around a bit longer but that is about it. It would have reduced piracy by a whole lot on the 360 side though that would have been the best benefit. It would have probably delayed the launch of the console also so maybe the RROD problem wouldn't have been as big since it would have launched with slightly better hardware. |
I agree, HD-DVD was a lost cause. Blu-ray was and still is more effecient.
Yay!!!