I think you misunderstood him or he used the wrong words.

I think he meant ps360 capped = running at 0-60fps and no more than 60fps
And wiiu constant 60fps (not 59 and lower at any given time)

What I meant was that it said the 360/PS3 versions ran at 60fps "max" while the Wii U had no such limit, meaning it could theoretically go higher. In hindsight I realize that's not very likely, as they'd probably just use that extra power for other things besides a 60+ fps.

Activision I can understand, but surely it's not asking much of a system with 2GB of RAM and a more modern GPU with more fillrate and features than its competitors to produce a PS3/360 game at 720p/60fps?

We'll see. I hear the Wii U still has a disadvantage in CPU versus the 360/PS3, I wonder how much of an importance that will play. I honestly don't understand my tech stuff too much, but I believe the SNES was in a similar position versus the Genesis. It was capable of producing much better visuals but struggled to run action-heavy games like SHMUPs without some considerable frame drops.

We'll see. I hear the Wii U still has a disadvantage in CPU versus the 360/PS3, I wonder how much of an importance that will play. I honestly don't understand my tech stuff too much, but I believe the SNES was in a similar position versus the Genesis. It was capable of producing much better visuals but struggled to run action-heavy games like SHMUPs without some considerable frame drops.

I didnt read any of the comments but when i said "true" HD i mean = 1280x720  the standard resolution attached to the HD term, the 360 previous CoD games were runing at 1024x600 and they changed that for black ops 2 now it will be 880x720, you can call it 720p if you want but is not the true standard HD is what i mean.

want proof? heres the digital foundry article from eurogamer

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-60fps-challenge

That's not trolling, but saying Killzone (most likely 2 or 3) is a bad game could be interpreted as trolling.

The CPU is likely clocked lower but it also likely handles more operations per clock cycle making the early reports of it being weak or clocked low irrelevant.

You're going to base hardware performance on a game that has had 6 years of hardware development, engine development and is the lead development platform against a console with the first entry and it's an unoptimised port?   That's a fair basis of comparison to you?