By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Halo 4 gets a 20/100 on Meta, proves eview system is broken.

Jay520 said:
ZaneWane said:
Jay520 said:
ZaneWane said:
2 out of 10 for halo and 4 out of 10 to uncharted 3 is trolling

LOL Am I the only person who found this hilarious?

i dont understand


Your statement could be interpreted in two ways

One one hand, you could be saying that the scores 2/10 and 4/10 are too low for high-quality games.

On the other hand, you could be saying that Halo is better than Uncharted 3 and putting UC3>Halo is trolling. It's funny because both 2/4 are ridiculously low and quibling over the order is pretty hilarious. This probably isn't what you meant to say, but this was just a thought that ran through my mind. 

but that is what i am saying



Around the Network
riderz13371 said:



I don't get it.

You will soon

Seriosly, this meme isnt needed just like Jay said.  All three Sony, nintendo, and Microsoft fans respect Halo as a good game.  It's like a Microsoft and Nintendo fan trying to say Uncharted is bad.  People will just laugh at them.  To see a 20/100 review people are going to be upset about it and mark that site as unreliable.




       

ZaneWane said:

but that is what i am saying


I believe you. I'm just saying the ambiguity of your statement is pretty funny.



this really shouldn't be a surprise....people are fools if the put the choice of buying a game to the hands of reviewers.



It gives me the creeps to even think about what Halo 4's user score will be on Tuesday. My guess is 3.9 out of 10. The fanboys are gonna rip this game to shreds, almost as much as they're going to rip Black Ops II to shreds.



Around the Network

You know his review is BS when 58 Other publications rated Halo 4 in the 70~100 range. I don't even play Halo, but this review reeks of all sorts.



Some people seem to underestimate the importance of metascores for a given company and it's employees.
It's become a standard in the industry to have the highest metascore as possible.

They're used in financial statements to sway investors and reassure shareholders.

Bonus are given to developers if games reach certain metascore thresholds.

It's also the legacy the game leaves behind summed up in a single number (for people who never played it).



So their lowest reviewed game ever is Halo 4? what makes Halo 4 the worst game in the world in their mind? 2/10 should be given to games that cannot be played for any longer then an hour.



Farsala said:
So their lowest reviewed game ever is Halo 4? what makes Halo 4 the worst game in the world in their mind? 2/10 should be given to games that cannot be played for any longer then an hour.

He gave 2/10 for a lot of games like Resident Evil 6.



He didn't like it? So...?