http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/sony-we-dont-buy-exclusivity

SCEA boss Jack Tretton has criticised what he described as the "different approach" of rival platform holders, stating that Sony won't "bribe" developers to make PS3 exclusives.

Speaking in the latest issue of PSM magazine Tretton said, "Microsoft is too dependent upon the third-party community, and Nintendo is too dependent upon first-party. We like to feel that we got a pretty good mix.

"We have a very different approach to exclusives than some of our competitors," he continued.

"We don't buy exclusivity. We don't fund development. We don't, for lack of a better term, bribe somebody to only do a game on our platform."

"We earn it by saying, 'You can build a better game on our platform. If you focus your development on our platform, you will ultimately be more successful. We can try to partner up with you from a technology standpoint. We can try to partner up with you from a marketing standpoint. But just economically and technologically, this is the system that makes the most sense for you.'"

Not gonna lie that was sone pretty terrible PR from Tretton

i would say sony said to ubisoft "let's make a nice assassins creed 3 bundle + you will get nice e3 stage time at the sony stage and you make little bit more content for us then"

Tretton is fundamentally correct though. The PS3 is best used when games are exclusive to it, this is should undisputed and proven by now. Sony has the best of both worlds even though they screwed up big time this gen with their launch price. They are live in harmony with first, second and third party. Nintendo was too dependent on first party and Microsoft has always been dependent on third party. Their third party became on par with Sonys third party hence part of the PS2 owners jumping ship to the 360. That only did one thing though, it made Sonys first party stronger.

Sorry, late here, and I'm not going to scroll through all of the pages, but, what's going on with this "embargo?"

And are 360 owners seriously whining about exclusive content, timed or not, for the PS3?

Welcome to our world, where Microsoft pays everyone for exclusivity and timed DLC.

Here's some advice if that's the case: GET OVER IT.

30 minutes to go until the embargo is lifted.

Great, not much different from the last AC, but you can see much more because there are less large structures standing in your way. Its more house to house. The churches are the high points in the city, which so far isnt really that high, but nevertheless its cool. Feels quite deceptively similar to the last games even though noticable changes have been made. The graphics are better than Revelations and the models and animations are newer, desmond and the other characters look more real than last game for sure. Sword play is more fluid if you match your parries this time. You still have the old multi-kill  manouvers but theres so many ways to kill. I love taking peoples battle rifles and shooting, killing the next guy, dropping the deceaseds gun and continuing to fire. It takes a while to reload, like six seconds and those leave you wide open for getting shot, so I tend to just drop the gun and grab the next one that hasnt been fired off of a dead guy. 

yeah sure that must be the reason why MS inreased the 360 disc size by over 1GB >.>

Basically your whole post is wrong. The majority of games have lots of free space left on the discs that are simply unused. DVD-9 is enough for 99% of all current gen games.

AC III's singleplayer disc is filled with 6.8GB worth of data. Still 1.15GB left which is easily enough to include the extra missions, which are combined one hour long.

15 minutes left?

Now yes.