Stefl1504 said: At least we have one - two confirmable townies now. (Masons) DarkT, it is true... rol could've stopped the vote, but thinking back at last game, if I voted in the right way (which I only realised later on) I could've also possibly stopped a lynch. Sometimes there are just situations where you do not see an option (and I do believe that Rol wasn't that anti-lynch regarding MBP)
|
That could definately be a reason yes, but he had just changed his vote to no-lynch. He would have been looking at the table and analysing players moves. He did that well last game with his last minute vote on FF to ensure that Linkz did not draw it by voting tabaha. It doesn't seem like a very likely thing Rol would do.
That indeed leads me to think Rol just wasn't anti-MBP lynch. If so, why did he not voted MBP? To avoid suspicion on him if he flipped town? (As he did) or maybe because he knew it wasn't worth it, as town was definately going to loose a player tonight anyway.
Then to say it was a scummy move, without doing anything to counter the supposed scumminess just makes me more suspicious of him. If he was scum, then he played it perfectly. Ensuring little suspicion was him, by not being the last to vote for someone, whilst still allowing scum to get a night kill without anyone being under suspicion. Then, when someone not scum votes another town, rather then blocking that, he let the other town die. Whilst simultaneous hiking up suspicion on a non-scum by saying it was a scummy move.
On the flip side, he could have just overlooked his stopping of a lynch, and then just raised suspicion of what he thought was a scummy move. I find his unlikely though.
I would probably be voting him If I didn't think zero should be either given a final warning, or lynched/ killed.