JazzB1987 said:
|
I have met enough vegetarians to know that they at least as much as meat eaters try to force their way of life onto other people.
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE
Answer the damn question! | |||
| Absolutely not. | 150 | 53.38% | |
| No, but the treatment of animals is wrong. | 89 | 31.67% | |
| Yes, but I'm still gonna eat meat. | 16 | 5.69% | |
| Yes, and I'm lowering my meat-intake | 12 | 4.27% | |
| Yes, and I don't eat meat. | 14 | 4.98% | |
| Total: | 281 | ||
JazzB1987 said:
|
I have met enough vegetarians to know that they at least as much as meat eaters try to force their way of life onto other people.
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE
JazzB1987 said:
Dude srop it please:) your replies are hilarious and another example of LETS DEFEND MY LIFESTYLE FOR THE SAKE OF DEFENDING IT. Itd natual for people to eat animals as well seeing as weve been doing it for thounsands of millenium. And do you think animals care that they dont get a chance to be free? There animals and no matter who eats them there just as dead. Giving an animal a chance to survice in the wild somehow means something to the animals? PLerase explain why a cow would care if it was butchered on a farm or eaten in the wild despite not having the intelligence to know the dofference?
Im saying that thats why we eat animals. You dont eat babies even if they tasted good because they have emotions and a future with hopes and dreams that give life value to human beings that animals dont have. I dont think i need to eat meat i eat it because it taste good and provides valuable nutrients. Yes the meat industry like EVERY OTHER INDUSTRY IN THE WORLD wants you to eat more meat and will highlight its strong points. You could equally say that the animals rights movement is lying to you because they dont want people to eat meat or the vegeterian food products industry is lying to you to get you to buy its food. We were eating meat loooooooooooooooooooooooong before the meat industry became a commercial force so you're argument has been proved wrong by history in that people have decided that they liked meat by themselves. Why not create more? Do you think a pig contenplates the short life it has been given before it dies? No it lacks the intelligence to know and the emotions to care at all. And what i meant by the space argument is that while chickens populations in the wild may have been hurt by human land development (something that anyone who live in a house "aka you" is a part of) their predators have also had their populations reduced. If making both arguments. I dont believe they appreciate life at all so ten years or one day of animal life makes no difference to me. But you on the other had do believe animals have the intelligence to appreciate life and therefore i argue that an animal who appreciates life (but would be unable to know its inpending doom) would enjoy one year of life more than not being born at all. In my opinion the point of existence is to experience happiness and other emotions. Without humans to appreciate the world or other beings capable of emotion their would no point to the world at all. Any resources used to creat human happiness are not wasted at all in my opinion. Instinct and emotion are not the same thing. The second type is something we cant explain yet thats the complex emotions such as jealousy. We dont really understand how they work and especially not how they work for animals. If we cant understand them ourselves how can we claim animals have them? Or one cat protecting its food source I mean would you clone neanderthalers and eat them because they are tasty and tell them to STFU because without you they would not exist? Just because you helped them you feel they owe you something in this case their meat? Would you eat your own baby? It is meat and its just there because you made it cant. And its proven that human babies are more stupid than ape babies so they cant complain right? Using neanderthales as an argument does not work becuase they are capable of emotion. I have said constantly that its wrong to eat humans (neanderthals included) because they are capable of emotion. And human babies can experience emotions where animals cant so intelligence does not matter. But i will concede that we should not eat primates as they have sufficently displayed their intelligence and emotional capacity. Yes it does in my opinion. |
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE
| kain_kusanagi said: We aren't meat eaters, we are omnivores. |
that's why i eat meat, i don't want to survive eating pants!
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’
Well humans are naturally frugivores, thrive mostly on raw fruits, succulent fruit-like vegetables, roots, shoots, nuts and seeds, Human teeth are not designed for tearing flesh as in the lion, wolf or dog, but rather compare closely with other fruit-eating animals. Human teeth correspond almost identically to the chimpanzees and other frugivores. I try to maintain a healthy diet but struggle at times, I love bacon, especially love a full English

SlayerRondo said:
I have met enough vegetarians to know that they at least as much as meat eaters try to force their way of life onto other people. |
But only when you confront them with WHY ARE YOU VEGETARIAN? Thats what I say. I mean not that gay and being vegetarian is anything alike but you see people saying WHY ARE YOU GAY? ETC. and then you see people say WHY ARE YOU VEGETARIAN? I have never ever seen gay people trying to convince "normal" people to go gay.
Everything that is not "mainstream" is being questioned. Thats why its a simple fact that "normals" are the preachy ones.
And I am not talking about activists I am talking about the average joe.

JazzB1987 said:
|
I guess weve both had different experiences throughout our lives.
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE
It's a matter of opinion and in my opinion there is nothing wrong with it.
Back in the 1930s Germany many members of "The Cult of Health and Beauty" and such like groups not only thought that eating meat was unhealthy but immoral.
When food got scare they soon forgot how immoral it was.
Should food problems arise in the future for whatever reasons I am sure many who shout loudest about eating meat being immoral will be at the front of the queue for their ration of bacon.
I don't think there is technically anything wrong with eating meat. Yes, we could just eat more vegetables(the basis of veganism), but I think that fails to acknowledge one reality. Plants are ALIVE TOO! Just because we cannot hear their muffled screams as we tear into their body, doesn't mean they probably cannot feel or that makes it any better than taking an animal life. Unfortunately for us, to sustain life we have to consume other living things for their energy. Death has to take place for life to be sustainable in some fashion, this is just the harsh reality of it all.


![]()
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)
| Jay520 said:
I personally don't think it's natural for humans to eat maet.
|
why o why isn't it? :) neanderthals did it when it was pretty much just instinct-based. Sure, they did it, don't think they thought that much about why, humans have digestive systems that can break down allmost anything (except grass etc.).
If your body is capable to eat a certain thing (wo. throwing up.. like with grass i.e.) why wouldn't it be called natural? (since our ancestors waaaaaay back ate meat too)
just got stuck on that one line and got interested to hear your thoughts why :) 'cause thats ilogical thinking' /slander /callingNames /rude
and all that.. :P
| forevercloud3000 said: I don't think there is technically anything wrong with eating meat. Yes, we could just eat more vegetables(the basis of veganism), but I think that fails to acknowledge one reality. Plants are ALIVE TOO! Just because we cannot hear their muffled screams as we tear into their body, doesn't mean they probably cannot feel or that makes it any better than taking an animal life. Unfortunately for us, to sustain life we have to consume other living things for their energy. Death has to take place for life to be sustainable in some fashion, this is just the harsh reality of it all. |