Do you like the new PS3 "super/ultra slim"? | |||
| Yes! I love it! | 95 | 41.13% | |
| No! I like the "pha... | 42 | 18.18% | |
| No! I like the "sli... | 51 | 22.08% | |
| results! | 43 | 18.61% | |
| Total: | 231 | ||
Its one of the ugliest consoles ever made.
It looks just off.
Preferred the 2 previous models by far.
| BHR-3 said: sony after a 3rd redesign why no wireeless N? like the new design but not the drive simply b/c the older ones and even the wii have auto slot loading sony should consider a top of the line model though with touch sensitive buttons more usbs and ps2 B/C id buy it |
That would be the right move.. and at the same point ensure people that ps4 for sure would be ps3 BC..
And the design.. the ps3 have always look like a toaster.. now it looks like a flat toaster.. thats better. but the ps2 slim design, was still much better..
Its a nice redesign. I prefer it to the current Slim.
The new disk drive looks cheap although that doesn't make it any less sexy.
| FrancisNobleman said: I may bite one of those... looks good and there's plenty of cheap AAA games now. Anyone knows if the 16GB model can be upgraded with an HDD ? If so, what kind of drive ? SATA? |
it sure can
any sata harddrive will do
Play Me
| fillet said: Just waiting for the comments from people who aren't die hard sony fans for a nice unbiased viewpoint on this. |
Looks pretty good, better then original slim. Though phat>all. I wonder what the weight is for all the consoles?
Nothing Sony will ever release is going to come close to the PS2 slim in sexiness. NOTHING: 
Just look at that thing.
The PS3 fat is nice, regal and shiny; the PS3 slim still looks regal but without the finger print-enducing shininess (so, a bit better), but the super slim is Sony's retarded brain-child. It's plain ugly and I hate it. And I don't see how a "super slim" can still be as wide as the other versions of the console. They should have waited for when they were able to actually make a vast improvement in size instead of making it marginally better. The slits for sliding the top loader thing make it look cheap, too. If anything, a top loader that pops like the GC's or PS2's is a better idea aesthetically - makes the surface of the console look smooth and not like an old man's ass.
Not buying it. And I need a PS3 too.
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."
| c03n3nj0 said: And I don't see how a "super slim" can still be as wide as the other versions of the console. They should have waited for when they were able to actually make a vast improvement in size instead of making it marginally better. |
The Super Slim is actually not as wide as the other versions
| Jay520 said: I am seriously surprised at how many people like the original PS3. It's so bulky, excessively shiny, and is a fingerprint magnet. To each his own I guess. |
I agree. I don't like how shiny it is. Give me matte black for a console any day. It's so much more classy.
Still, either way, some people are getting kind of crazy. The difference between the three isn't all that great. It certainly wouldn't stand between me and a purchase if I wanted to play some games.
Jay520 said:
The Super Slim is actually not as wide as the other versions |
I'm not going to put my console friggin' standing up. When I say wide, I mean when it's laying down. In that picture you can see how it's as tall as the old slim.
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
