prayformojo said:
archbrix said:
Max King of the Wild said: Is that why Wii has 42% market and slipping? The mass market cared about the ps2 hence the 80% market share and climbing |
And? Once more you follow up with something that I'm not debating. My point above still stands.
But since you bring it up, it's foolish to believe that the market would have so readily abandoned the Wii had Nintendo continued to heavily support it. The console would already be past the 100m mark had that been the case.
|
Proof? Where is the proof it would have chugged along sales wise? Do you have some sort of future telling machine or a what if caculator? All you are going on is what you BELIEVE would have happened. Personally, I believe the reason the sales dive occured is due to the fact that most of the Wii craze came off the backs of people who weren't gamers to begin with. They were hipsters, and people who just wanted to have the hottest "it" thing. When you look at the rise of mobile gaming, and the ipad, and you factor in the shift towards farmville...I think it's clear what happened. Nintendo didn't see it coming, and THAT'S why the Wii went down hill so fast. Facebook and mobile gaming took those non gamers away and all that was left was the core fanbase, or the "Gamecube" base.
This generation, those non gamers aren't coming back because they've moved on. If the Wii-U does well, it'll be because Nintendo made great core gamers.
|
Do you have proof or possess some clairvoyance to the contrary? No? Then it seems we're at an impasse on that subject, no? Now then, I'll address your points:
Yes, the "hipsters" as you put it were a big part of the Wii craze. But the Wii was not a console designed to have a 10 year life span and it was very front loaded. The fact is that Nintendo could've kept making great games - core or otherwise - for the Wii and prolonged its sales. Yes, the "craze" would have been over, but we wouldn't have seen such a drastic drop in sales as we saw when support was dropped almost altogether.