By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - How do you feel about the performance of the VGChartz mod team?

 

How is the VGChartz mod team doing?

It's doing a great job. 299 32.97%
 
It's doing okay. 143 15.77%
 
It's not doing well. 432 47.63%
 
Total:874
Kantor said:
Yoshiya said:

" after 4-6 months (depending on mod) " - direct quote from Blacksaber

Surely the moment the words "depending on the mod" are used to describe policy if suggests you don't have proper guidelines in place?

Just to clarify I am not discussing what each warning is worth in ban time but rather how long those warnings count towards you ban time.

Blacksaber is not and never has been a moderator.

The official "good behaviour" cutoff is six months, but it depends on the seriousness of the offence, the length of the mod history, and a whole host of other things. You can't have guidelines for all of that.

Ah ok. Surely you should have made that more clear to people before now though? We have had a few people in here clearly confused, I had no idea (although I am still relatively new so that is understandable) and Blacksaber clearly thought that it varied from mod to mod. It's this kind of things which help people to understand why they are being moderated as they are and thus you won't end up with people complaining for unjust moderations so much.



Around the Network
NintendoPie said:
man-bear-pig said:


Is that when I posted 'YOU HAVE WARTS IN YOUR VAGINA!!' on your wall like 100 times? To me, that was funny. But Moreno pm'd you and asked you to report me...which was shady, since you didn't really care...

How did you find out tha... nevermind.

Yes, that was the case. It wasn't funny to me. 


Yeah I know...but the fact at it annoyed you so much made it funnier for me. I guess I have a wierd sense of humour?



man-bear-pig said:


Yeah I know...but the fact at it annoyed you so much made it funnier for me. I guess I have a wierd sense of humour?

No, you're just demented.



NintendoPie said:
man-bear-pig said:


Yeah I know...but the fact at it annoyed you so much made it funnier for me. I guess I have a wierd sense of humour?

No, you're just demented.


Here's the truth: During that 1-2 month period I was deliberately trying to get banned, so anything I said during that time was for the sole purpose of getting me banned. That's why I got into so many fights with seece and to a lesser extent Moreno at the time. You should see some of the PM's me and seece had...they were worse that the source/seeces arguments. But that's behind me now.

When I say 'get back to being myself' I mean the MBP from Dec 2011- March 2012 (minus February 2012, due to the spamming gamrpoint war I had with pezus)



man-bear-pig said:


Here's the truth: During that 1-2 month period I was deliberately trying to get banned, so anything I said during that time was for the sole purpose of getting me banned. That's why I got into so many fights with seece and to a lesser extent Moreno at the time. You should see some of the PM's me and seece had...they were worse that the source/seeces arguments. But that's behind me now.

When I say 'get back to being myself' I mean the MBP from Dec 2011- March 2012 (minus February 2012, due to the spamming gamrpoint war I had with pezus)

I knew what you were talking about when you said that.



Around the Network
trasharmdsister12 said:
man-bear-pig said:

Tads12 wanting to ban me for a joke post I made which he didn't understand.

I did? Care to remind me? Either my work is driving me crazy and I don't remember this or my work is making me ornery on the boards. That's right; ornery.

 


http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4721463

EDIT: I thought I was this one http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4719219 , but it's actually the one above



trasharmdsister12 said:
man-bear-pig said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4721463

EDIT: I thought I was this one http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4719219 , but it's actually the one above

I locked the thread without banning anyone. If I had wanted to ban you for that post, you would have been banned for it. You're lucky I was the mod who got to that thread .


I heard that you wanted to ban me for that post, but you discussed it with another mod who found it funny and didn't find it banable, so I wasn't banned...I'm pretty sure it was you who wanted to ban me for it...



Oh, I see you italicised the word wanted...well then, you 'considered' or 'pondered' banning me for it. Potato, potato. (pronounced pot-ate-oh, pot-at-oh)



man-bear-pig said:
trasharmdsister12 said:
man-bear-pig said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4721463

EDIT: I thought I was this one http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4719219 , but it's actually the one above

I locked the thread without banning anyone. If I had wanted to ban you for that post, you would have been banned for it. You're lucky I was the mod who got to that thread .


I heard that you wanted to ban me for that post, but you discussed it with another mod who found it funny and didn't find it banable, so I wasn't banned...I'm pretty sure it was you who wanted to ban me for it...

 

Who, outside of moderators, would know this?

If what you're saying in the bolded is true, does that mean someone on the mod staff is giving out personal information?



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

hatmoza said:

Who, outside of moderators, would know this?

If what you're saying in the bolded is true, does that mean someone on the mod staff is giving out personal information?

Why does it matter to you?