So the Onlive folks think they can have a monopoly on cloud gaming merely because they've registered a patent?
If the patent is "fundamental" to cloud gaming then they are obliged to make it available on FRAND terms. Which means Gaikai just needs to do due diligence and obtain the rights to use the patent and Steve can't touch them.
Anyway I think they are probably overstating their patent case, because cloud gaming isn't all that much of a step up from the sort of browser gaming that's been happening for ages, before FB gaming got big even. There's possibly more ways to skin that cat, and you can't patent the idea of cloud gaming, you have to patent the method. Other than being able to stream higher quality games, what's materially different to the FTP browser stuff my son's been playing for ages?
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
well im pretty sure sony have looked into this before buying the company for 380 million, but who the hell knows, but patent law suits are nothing new to the world of electronics, just ask apple and samsung

If OnLive has them patents, whoever gets a hold of the corporation should sue the shit out of Sony. Patents are sacred and no one messes with them.
Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1
this just seems like a money grab from Onlive, they wait until now to possibly sue Gaikai and or Sony? I'd dont know if Onlive is one of the leaders of cloud tech, but suing on the "fundamentals" of cloud seems like a stretch.
Meh.. Read over their patents. They won't have a leg to stand on. Plus Sony has patents on this suff way before onlive. It's going to be fun watching them get stepped on like ants.
I really don't see this being a problem. Gaikai probably has just as many important patents that Onlive has. They've probably been cross licensing them with each other. An AMD/intel relationship going on. The only way I can see this going bad was if Apple were to pick up Onlive to do battle with Sony over Android... Which I honestly don't see happening
I get the impression that the head people in this company are horrible, horrible people. With not a great deal of business sense by the sounds of things either.
At this point in time, I think Onlive is primarily looking for money to save the company ... You can't really blame them