By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Can Sony catch a break? OnLive’s Patents Could be Used to “Sue the Sh*t Out of” Gaikai

Sony Computer Entertainment’s $380 million purchase of cloud company Gaikai earlier this year was a big deal – the division’s largest to date. But the service could already be in trouble.
With OnLive having gone bankrupt and preparing to reboot with less than half the staff due to an unknown investor, all sorts of rumors are coming out of the employees who were sadly laid off. One source allegedly told Joystiq:
Steve got all excited when Gaikai got acquired, because it kind of validated everything we did.
Continuing to say that, around the same time, OnLive’s patent for gameplay streaming was approved:
So all of a sudden, Steve was like ‘When the time is right, we’re going to hit them with our patent because we’re not going to let some two-bit company ride our coattails.
I guarantee that some time in the future, Steve is going to go to court and sue the shit out of them for stealing our ideas.
How important the patent exactly is is probably something that will be left to the courts, but was previously described as “fundamental” to cloud-gaming by CEO Steve Perlman. OnLive also holds several other patents that could also possibly be used a court case against Gaikai, putting Sony’s plans for the costly company at risk.


Around the Network

Onlive seems very scared since Gaikai was acquired by Sony.



So the Onlive folks think they can have a monopoly on cloud gaming merely because they've registered a patent?

If the patent is "fundamental" to cloud gaming then they are obliged to make it available on FRAND terms. Which means Gaikai just needs to do due diligence and obtain the rights to use the patent and Steve can't touch them.

Anyway I think they are probably overstating their patent case, because cloud gaming isn't all that much of a step up from the sort of browser gaming that's been happening for ages, before FB gaming got big even. There's possibly more ways to skin that cat, and you can't patent the idea of cloud gaming, you have to patent the method. Other than being able to stream higher quality games, what's materially different to the FTP browser stuff my son's been playing for ages?



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

well im pretty sure sony have looked into this before buying the company for 380 million, but who the hell knows, but patent law suits are nothing new to the world of electronics, just ask apple and samsung



If OnLive has them patents, whoever gets a hold of the corporation should sue the shit out of Sony. Patents are sacred and no one messes with them.



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1

Around the Network

this just seems like a money grab from Onlive, they wait until now to possibly sue Gaikai and or Sony? I'd dont know if Onlive is one of the leaders of cloud tech, but suing on the "fundamentals" of cloud seems like a stretch.



Meh.. Read over their patents. They won't have a leg to stand on. Plus Sony has patents on this suff way before onlive. It's going to be fun watching them get stepped on like ants.



I really don't see this being a problem. Gaikai probably has just as many important patents that Onlive has. They've probably been cross licensing them with each other. An AMD/intel relationship going on. The only way I can see this going bad was if Apple were to pick up Onlive to do battle with Sony over Android... Which I honestly don't see happening



I get the impression that the head people in this company are horrible, horrible people. With not a great deal of business sense by the sounds of things either.



At this point in time, I think Onlive is primarily looking for money to save the company ... You can't really blame them