You're not old enough or from US to really understand this. But yes, that is NSFW and therefore should be changed.
Do you think my avatar is to sexual? | |||
She not showing anything so no. | 18 | 24.66% | |
What are we in the 1950'... | 6 | 8.22% | |
It is close but doesn't need to be changed? | 6 | 8.22% | |
Dude this site talks about anal sex. WTF!!! | 11 | 15.07% | |
Yes i think it needs to be changed. | 30 | 41.10% | |
Total: | 71 |
You're not old enough or from US to really understand this. But yes, that is NSFW and therefore should be changed.
Not this crap again...
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
I'm not sure I understand the difference between NSFW and straddling the line.
Can someone post some straddling pics to compare with nsfw pics?
theprof00 said: I'm not sure I understand the difference between NSFW and straddling the line. Can someone post some straddling pics to compare with nsfw pics? |
Well, that's where the question of individual opinion comes in. For me, i would interpret this rule rather liberally. I believe the way that bikini provides so little coverage in the OPs avatar would constitute a violation, but something more concealing wouldn't be. Others on the staff may take a harder line.
Or do you mean the kind of "straddling" pics that would also be unsafe for work?
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
I personally don't have a problem with the OPs avatar, but unfortunately it's now against the rules because everybody went way overboard with that sort of thing.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
Mr Khan said:
Well, that's where the question of individual opinion comes in. For me, i would interpret this rule rather liberally. I believe the way that bikini provides so little coverage in the OPs avatar would constitute a violation, but something more concealing wouldn't be. Others on the staff may take a harder line. Or do you mean the kind of "straddling" pics that would also be unsafe for work? |
I'm confused.
Is this SFW?
theprof00 said: I'm confused. Is this SFW? |
Hmm, yes. As a Man's nipple's have been considered different than a Woman's.
Making stupid rules like this doesn't exactly help keep members on this website.
NobleTeam360 said: Making stupid rules like this doesn't exactly help keep members on this website. |
This rule shouldn't make someone soooo mad that they would want to leave, that would be kind of sad.
easyrider said:
If you want to see porn. LOOK UP PORN. it's not that hard. however this is not porn, nor considered porn. |
It says pronographic content is never aloud.
Therefore when it says "some suggestive content is allowed" it means something LESS suggestive then porn.