PSwii60 said:
happydolphin said:
PSwii60 said:
More importantly, I believe this is defensive move on Nintendo's part should Wii U achieve only moderate success similar to Gamecube. They cannot afford to have a failing home and handheld consoles.
|
Interesting. I'll just say I don't agree with bold, it isn't business realistic.
How does the 3DS getting limelight correlate to Nintendo preparing for the case where WiiU underachieves?
|
I see 3DS/Wii U in the same position where Gamecube/Gameboy was. Their focus on 3DS is to make it a successful and profitable product the same way Gameboy was, should Wii U fail. Gameboy carried them financially more so than the gamecube did during the sixth gen and they hope to replicate that if Wii U underachieve.
|
Okay, I see what you mean now and it makes sense.
Now that I actually understand what you mean I'll disagree, and always respectfully.
What we know about the 3DS is that it needed to gain the confidence of Japanese developers first and foremost in order to succeed. With a close looming Vita launch, the 3DS only had so much time to fend off the powerful playstation brand while it was the sole gen8 player in the market, hence the price drop. Of course Nintendo wanted it to succeed, and I don't think it had much to do with the home console brother.
In the meantime I believe Nintendo has high hopes for the WiiU to even surpass its handheld business, and as such I don't think they see the 3DS as the backup plan anymore. Add to that the fact that the initial price drop cause many financial losses on the short-term, it's hard to warrant such an expensive back-up plan, wouldn't you agree? Imho there was another motivation behind that, and I believe it to be Nintendo fearing the competition from Mobile markets, and the inability to fend that threat off unless they are truly the #1 handheld maker, with enough leverage to counter that threat. In 2nd place they wouldn't be in a position to do anything about it.