By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - PS3 Super Slim Coming this year?

Sal.Paradise said:
NintendoPie said:
Why would they do this? The normal PS3 Slim is slim enough.

Kaz won't be satisfied until it's Wii U sized :x

LOL! I don't know. Doesn't teh cell need quite a bit of room?



Around the Network
pezus said:
NintendoPie said:
Why would they do this? The normal PS3 Slim is slim enough.

Not really, it is still quite big. I want to see a version that isn't as flat and wide as the current slim.

That's a big enough improvement.



Yes, the fat looks miles better. One with the same proportions but thinner ala the PS2 slim would be perfect.



pezus said:


What if you look at it from another angle?

The original looks so much sexier imo. I want a slim version of that

I have to agree.... the original is a sexy beast.



Cool sounds great! The PS3 slim is way better than the fat, but is still big for a console. I might even have to buy a super slim if the price is right.



Around the Network

Sony may keep the PS3's price tag as is to avoid the PS Vita looking to expensive next to the PS3.



This may entice me to buy one, if there is a price cut that comes along with it that is.



id be a bit shocked if a new designed ps3 releases

as long as they dont remove more features and add ones that are needed like wireless N then i will probably buy it

i also hope the pics are true and that it will have a rectangle shape instead of a perfect square like the current ps3



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

A_C_E said:
Sony may keep the PS3's price tag as is to avoid the PS Vita looking to expensive next to the PS3.

here in Germany the price of a PS3 effectively already is 200€, so I do expect an official price cut to 199€ when they introduce that new model



Zim said:
 

The word you are looking for is width lol. It was just a quickly made comparison by someone on neogaf. It's not 100% accurate. Just a good representation. The difference in width in real world and that picture really isn't a large amount at all. 

English is not my native language so I can make mistakes XD.  It is nice to learn something in order to get better ;D

I think that a better comparison pic would be this:

I used the Sony comparison pic, and arranged the fat and the slim to match their actual size.  If you compare this pic with the original, you can clearly see that the slim is taller and, considering the fact that it is a square, also has more width :D.

Now this new slimmer version makes sense :D

EDIT: I checked a dictionary and wide can also be used  ¬_¬