Skyrim was a great game but it actually felt fairly shallow to me. It's definitely not a better game than Super Mario Galaxy, but whatever.

You won't get banned, I get the reference

Machina may be a bastard, but not in that sense, no.

The Skyrim review was mostly written by Naznatips. I just rewrote it for the PC version. All of the scores stayed the same, though, because it is really that good.

Skyrim got a score it deserves. Never read one review on here. I don't read reviews I watch them on IGN because written reviews take too long and reveal too much. That and I almost always agree with IGN. Plus, I consider the reviewers here to have no better opinion than the average forum user on here.

Sorry I dont usually read the reviewers name when reading reviews I know its a bad habit but after this thread I'll change ;) .

Then I'll say you and Naznatips, just read a few more of your reviews, you seem to have a good set of standards on each review :)

it was a fairly good game, but you can´t overlook the bugs and the shortcomings. It is definetly not the best game on this site.

I disagree...Naz and I both played that game through to completion, and my first runthrough had me at 105 hours, and I encountered 1 whole glitch.  That's a pretty damn good glitch to content ratio, there's just a LOT of content in skyrim.  He had a similar experience, if I recall.  We can only review based on what we experience, we can't change things just becuase someone else had issues. That's why it got a 9.7

Skyrim is definitely underrated. At least deserved a 9.8 (which it got in my book).
Not even mentioning the disaster that Machina caused with Fallout 3... oh dammit I just mentioned it, didn't I ?

OT: Tor is the best IMO.

It's a cross between Kantor and Machina for me. Both of them are just excellent reviewers.