By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Pokemon Conquest is getting superb reviews (IGN ~ (9.0)! Come check it out, then go buy it!!!

Chandler said:

Game Informer has it at 7/10, dragging the score down to 84. I'm not interested in Pokemon games, so I don't care, but their reasoning is a little strange.

"Pokémon Conquest takes the Pokémon you know and recognize (and love?) and places them into the world of tactical turn-based strategy with little kicking and screaming. Unfortunately, its simplicity will turn away tactical purists, and its complexity and management demands will turn off fans of the traditional Pokémon RPG.

So, is the game simple and complex at the same time or do I misunderstand something here?

It's too simple for hardcores and too complex for casual. You can pick one, not both. Some logic, LOL.



Around the Network
Chandler said:

Game Informer has it at 7/10, dragging the score down to 84. I'm not interested in Pokemon games, so I don't care, but their reasoning is a little strange.

"Pokémon Conquest takes the Pokémon you know and recognize (and love?) "

Can't imagine why Nintendo doesn't bend over to give them exclusives like GI wants....

To answer your question though, that's actually a plausible take. Too much X for Group A, Too little for Group B.



http://kotaku.com/5919578/pokemon-conquest-the-kotaku-review



VicViper said:
Ok, Poké-police!

Guilty of charge! It's a Luxio! Don't kill me!

I guess we could let you off with a warning this time



I woulda preordered this game with my DS had I known it was a pokemon SRPG.

I just thought it was going to be a regular pokemon game where you went around trying to win medals from Shinen Takeda while fighting Team Oda.

Interesting.

 

I STILL Don't get why Shingen didn't get some kind of large cat pokemon and Kenshin didn't get a Dragon. (Or at least a rival large cat pokemon).

 

I mean, hell it's in their nicknames!  Having those be there pokemon makes too much sense!



Around the Network
PullusPardus said:
Bitches don't know about my Nobunaga's Ambition obsession.


Meh, i'd take Romance of the Three Kingdoms over it anyday!


Espeically ROTK 8.

(I know this means nothing to pretty much everyone else).

 

Speaking of which.  I wonder if they're going to bother to translate that.

 

I'd rather have to not buy an overseas game and rely on a fan made patch.



Kasz216 said:
PullusPardus said:
Bitches don't know about my Nobunaga's Ambition obsession.


Meh, i'd take Romance of the Three Kingdoms over it anyday!


Espeically ROTK 8.

(I know this means nothing to pretty much everyone else).

 

Speaking of which.  I wonder if they're going to bother to translate that.

 

I'd rather have to not buy an overseas game and rely on a fan made patch.

I am guessing you like China's history more than Japan , Have you tried Kessen?



PullusPardus said:
Kasz216 said:
PullusPardus said:
Bitches don't know about my Nobunaga's Ambition obsession.


Meh, i'd take Romance of the Three Kingdoms over it anyday!


Espeically ROTK 8.

(I know this means nothing to pretty much everyone else).

 

Speaking of which.  I wonder if they're going to bother to translate that.

 

I'd rather have to not buy an overseas game and rely on a fan made patch.

I am guessing you like China's history more than Japan , Have you tried Kessen?

Not, i just like the gameplay differnces a bit more... and the displays seem a bit... "cleaner" i'd say.

That and the more turnbased nature of ROTK.  Nothing to me beats 8.  With the classic ROTK battles, the RPG elements and the ability to play a simple officer.   I'd get 4 friends together and we'd spend nights playing that game.

 

ROTK 10 Tried to copy 8, but had bugs and problems.

As for Kessen, yeah... it's ok.  Didn't overwhelm me though.