Wow are you serious? If we say Sonys pressconference being better than Nintendos its fanboyism and subjectivity but when its the other way round its not? Pathetic. Your opinion is no more objective than my opinion. Don't accuse others of fanboyism just because people didn't like your favourite company's conference. And looking at the poll, Sony won E3 with more then half of the votes.

Nintendo's conference started really good with Pikmin 3, then nothing really amazing happend after that. Playing Batman using the tablet screen seems really gimmicky, not to mention I finished that game last november.

Thanks, but my favourite gaming company isn't one of the big three. Additionally, I play PC first, and 360 second.

This site is known to be full of Sony fanboys anyways. Back in 2008, it was heavily populated by Nintendo fans and the few Sony fans complained, so Brent and the rest of the staff made a major push to bring in some Sony fans. It's been heavily weighted to Sony ever since, with Nintendo usually in second and Microsoft limping along behind.

Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them any less true. I wanted to see something much better from all three, but Sony and Microsoft left  with absolutely nothing special and very little actually presented. Nintendo presented more new stuff (though it was almost all stuff that everybody either knew about already or anticipated), and had a lot more content overall. Objectively, that is better.

What are the facts? Nintendos conference was best? Thats not a fact but your opinion. Your opinions are not facts, they're no more objective than mine opinion. Nintendos conference sucked, thats my opinion.

Thanks, but my favourite gaming company isn't one of the big three. Additionally, I play PC first, and 360 second.

This site is known to be full of Sony fanboys anyways. Back in 2008, it was heavily populated by Nintendo fans and the few Sony fans complained, so Brent and the rest of the staff made a major push to bring in some Sony fans. It's been heavily weighted to Sony ever since, with Nintendo usually in second and Microsoft limping along behind.

Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them any less true. I wanted to see something much better from all three, but Sony and Microsoft left  with absolutely nothing special and very little actually presented. Nintendo presented more new stuff (though it was almost all stuff that everybody either knew about already or anticipated), and had a lot more content overall. Objectively, that is better.

What are the facts? Nintendos conference was best? Thats not a fact but your opinion. Your opinions are not facts, they're no more objective than mine opinion. Nintendos conference sucked, thats my opinion.

Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them any less true. I wanted to see something much better from all three, but Sony and Microsoft left  with absolutely nothing special and very little actually presented. Nintendo presented more new stuff (though it was almost all stuff that everybody either knew about already or anticipated), and had a lot more content overall. Objectively, that is better.