Thats what I meant, they wont do exclusives for Sony. They will make multiplatform games from now on. There next game will be Overstrike and EA will publish it.

Less content? WTF are you talking about? Sony requires all Vita ports to have equal or more content than their PS3 counterparts.
Oh and why would someone need to buy both? They should be fine with only 1 version. If you prefer portable gaming, the Vita version is your best bet.

I said this a lot, but I'm sticking with this point of view. Vita has a software problem. Not a lack of software problem like most Vita fans like to say people are claiming. "Vita has no gaemz" is said most by Vita fans than anyone (it's actually doing quite alright in number and quality). But it has a software problem, nonetheless.

3DS won't lose MH, but if Sony allow it to launch an exclusive MH4 in japan, then it's almost over. 3DS will become a err... monster! No sane developer will develop a game for a system with 2 million user base (that number is so far away by sales trends) than to one with 13-15 million.

That's true, but the third parties should be facing the same problems. And it's mainly up to Sony to make sure that the system sells well so that third parties are willing/dare to try developing new IP's for the system.

Funny, the DS proved that in many ways people are MORE willing to buy portable versions of games, or at least are just AS willing.  Mariokart DS and NSMB for the DS were both massive sellers.  Basically, your argument fails.  See, you're saying that the only games that sell systems are huge franchises like Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto, then insinuate that it wouldn't be worth buying on a handheld when you have it on a home console. The only things that would make a handheld worth having would be original titles or handheld exclusives (pokemon), but the only games that sell systems are ones that can be found on consoles. In a roundabout way, you're basically saying there's no reason to have a handheld.  Kind of ignorant if you ask me.  

It should have less content in most cases simply because of the limited hardware and software format.

They should not be fine with only one version being bought. Are you expecting half of all PS3 gamers to abandon their system for the Vita once their favorite title arrives for it?

Bolded: People use their cellphones for portable gaming. Epic gaming experiences that you get from titles like Uncharted are much better suited for when playing at home.

Italics: No, I'm saying that the audience that Sony is trying to catch wouldn't have a reason for it. A hardcore gamer wouldn't play Call of Duty or GTA on the buss.

The DS/Wii software comparisons are invalid since they both are casual titles (unlike Cod/GTA/AC). NSMB is not very different (if at all) compared to cellphone games.

But does it have the same realism and feel to it as the one you get from playing the home console versions?

You're rather poor at this whole "seeing it from other people's perspective" thing, aren't you?  just becuase YOU would rather play it on a bigscreen doesn't mean that EVERYONE would rather play it on a big screen.  What if you're working in a job that requires you have no time at home but lots of time on a bus or subway?  what if you fly a lot?  what if you're in school?  what if you don't have a 1000 dollar TV?  what ifyou actually PREFER handheld gaming?  what if you like the added bonuses of using  touch screen or whatever?  there's dozens of reasons to play a game on a handheld, and you've managed to convince yourself that they're all pointless.  I cannot help someone so closeminded. 

Yes, why wouldn't it?  and remember, you can take your Vita/3DS with you everywhere you go, so it's not limited to playing it ONLY in one spot.