By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which gaming series need to die or decline in the future?

Call Of Duty.
I'm happy to see several people agree.



Around the Network
Marks said:
1. Mario - But that would leave Nintendo with just Zelda and Metroid since they don't make new IPs anymore, they just keep making sequels and remakes. Don't get me wrong, Mario is fun, but all I'm really trying to do here is stress that Nintendo needs new IP's, not just more Mario games. Mario is good every 3-4 years, and in that gap there should be new IPs.


They already have new IP's.

Pikmin, Animal Crossing, Fire Emblem, Super Smash Bros.



NintendoPie said:
Marks said:
1. Mario - But that would leave Nintendo with just Zelda and Metroid since they don't make new IPs anymore, they just keep making sequels and remakes. Don't get me wrong, Mario is fun, but all I'm really trying to do here is stress that Nintendo needs new IP's, not just more Mario games. Mario is good every 3-4 years, and in that gap there should be new IPs.


They already have new IP's.

Pikmin, Animal Crossing, Fire Emblem, Super Smash Bros.

The whole "Wii..." lineup of games is technically a new IP



Scoobes said:

The whole "Wii..." lineup of games is technically a new IP

True... true. Lookie here Marks! You have been proven wrong.



NintendoPie said:
Marks said:
1. Mario - But that would leave Nintendo with just Zelda and Metroid since they don't make new IPs anymore, they just keep making sequels and remakes. Don't get me wrong, Mario is fun, but all I'm really trying to do here is stress that Nintendo needs new IP's, not just more Mario games. Mario is good every 3-4 years, and in that gap there should be new IPs.


They already have new IP's.

Pikmin, Animal Crossing, Fire Emblem, Super Smash Bros.


Yeah true! But I mean like recently made. In the past 10 years what have they made aside from the Wii series and Brain Age? Those 4 series you listed are all over 10 years old. 



Around the Network
Marks said:
NintendoPie said:
Marks said:
1. Mario - But that would leave Nintendo with just Zelda and Metroid since they don't make new IPs anymore, they just keep making sequels and remakes. Don't get me wrong, Mario is fun, but all I'm really trying to do here is stress that Nintendo needs new IP's, not just more Mario games. Mario is good every 3-4 years, and in that gap there should be new IPs.


They already have new IP's.

Pikmin, Animal Crossing, Fire Emblem, Super Smash Bros.


Yeah true! But I mean like recently made. In the past 10 years what have they made aside from the Wii series and Brain Age? Those 4 series you listed are all over 10 years old. 

Steel Diver?

Xenoblade Chronicles?

Soma Bringer?

Disaster: Day of Crisis?

Nintendogs?

Giftpia?

Chibi Robo?

Dillon's Rollilng Western?

Art Style?

Maboshi?

Sakura Samurai?

Odama?




Sir, you have no right to say that Mario kart does not deserve those sales, you have no argument against it other than your obvious bias.



None. Just because you or I don't like a popular series of games why does that mean they should die? Other people clearly enjoy the games otherwise they wouldn't be as popular as they are. And as others have said, if these popular series die that doesn't mean that the people who played them will magically start playing the games that you like.



Another bizarre "I want so and so to fail" I really don't understand it.
There may be some series that I do not like, or do not play....but would never want them to fail.
There can be no other reason except to say jealousy is the culprit here. Why else would it bother you?
Let people play what they want to play, and I will play what I want to play. Why do people even care?......strange.



                                  Gaming Away Life Since 1985


oniyide said:
the problem i have with the OPs line of thinking in general is that there is no way to be sure that people would play something else if these games did not exist. Would people start to play SonicAllStars or Modnation in lieu of MK?? Would people play another FPS instead of COD?? would they play Rayman instead of Mario?? Some how I really doubt it, it would be nice, but wishful thinking at best.

OT I just think COD doesnt need to be a yearly franchise, every other year sure. BUt I cant stand the IW/MW games so as far as im concerned i treat it as its not a yearly franchise. Casual sports games or what people like to play nothing we can do about that

Bingo. If people wanted those other games, they would play them. The OPs line of thinking really would only work for games that corner their own market (e.g. if Madden declined so that other football games could take their place, because there is relatively static demand for an NFL sim that definitely would take its business elsewhere)

Hell, the sales of Nintendo consoles says we need more (2D) super mario games, not less, because that keeps more people in gaming that otherwise would not be.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.