oh do explaing lo lI"m interested in the insight into this if there is any

excpet the ps3 library

smaller yeah because it sold less (for obvious reasons) but as far as depth of library goes I challenge you to find me ONE game in ANY genere that was on the ps2 that didn't show up on ps3 (this should be fun)

don't lump Sony in with MS

if this guy wanted his game on PS3 it would be on PS3 simple as that, MS would tell the to fuck off sure, but Sony would remove all online restictions needed to make it happen, I know this becasue they've done this....

excpet the ps3 library

smaller yeah becasue it sold less (for obvious reasons) but as far as depth of library goes I challenge you to find me ONE game in ANY genere that was on the ps2 that didn't show up on ps3 (this should be fun)

don't lump Sony in with MS

if this guy wanted his game on PS3 it would be on PS3 simple as that, MS would tell the to fuck off sure, but Sony would remove all online restictions needed to make it happen, I know this becasue they've done this....

oh do explaing lo lI"m interested in the insight into this if there is any

ok I worded that wrong

I meant show me where the ps3 games library in lacking in depth compared to the ps2 and it has plenty of obscure Japanese rpgs missing this ONE games means nothing at all

remember "smaller yeah because it sold less"

As development costs go up, publishers tend to take fewer risks which leads to the money being spent on safe bets. This is why nowadays the majority of AAA games tend to have an M-rating, even though M-rated games on the whole only account for a small fraction of all games that are released. Aiming for an M-rating is considered the best option to achieve success.

The Wii kept development costs on par with sixth generation consoles, so the middle ground and therefore the variety of the PS2 era could have been maintained. But since third parties didn't want to make Wii games and the HD consoles posed a too large risk, the market looks like it does today. In the seventh generation, there is no console that offers the width and depth of the PS2 library.

lol dude plz FFS

I said before anything else "smaller because it sold less" now using simple logic (which escapes you ALL the time) doesn't that mean not EVERY game would have made it over, I mean I get it, you being who you are but seriously

and no if you have FPS represented on your console missing one FPS doesn't mean you lack FPS therefor you don't lack depth, every genre of gaming represented on the ps2 is also on the ps3 in form or another show me how that's not a fact

as far as variety and breath of genre's/experiences provided the ps3 and ps2 are near identical, this includes the AAA and AA style games

and to not get too off topic, this developer specifically is making is a free to play MMO FPS to which he says neither Sony or MS would support, despite the fact that Sony is releasing this very year a third party free to play MMO FPS... which would join the likes of Home, DCUO, and Free Realms as already supported Free to Play MMOs already released, so to say Sony wouldn't support this is just not true

now go ahead and deny it

you miss the point..... again........ watch it guys as it fly's smooth over his head

now here's my dilemma, do I waste my time saying it again only for him to miss is completely......again??? *deep breath*

ok one more time

"smaller because it sold less"

that means, it,  by default of selling less consoles, means less games would have been made and if less games were made the chance of not having every franchise is higher but because you don't understand, that's.... not.... the.... point....

the point is not that the ps3 has every single franchise that the ps2 had, it's that it has that genre covered in every form, from AAA to AA to A

this whole debate is that you can only make AAA and A games this gen and that's not TRUE especially for the PS3!!! your point is the the ps2 had AAA, AA, A games and the PS3 doesn't, but it does, plenty, just not as much as ps2, because it sold less, which just makes sense if your capable of accepting it.

so to put it simply: if the developer of that game/franchise you mentioned wants to put that game/franchise on the ps3 they could do it!!! your arguing circumstance, not the point the. Middleware market is still here an very much so supported, at least on Sony consoles...

I also like how you cherry pick, instead of responding to the whole post like the one regarding the developer in question