RolStoppable said:
What a pitiful excuse. You wanted me to name one game and I gave you an entire brand. Worse, now you make a contradictory statement. You insist that the PS3 library isn't lacking in depth compared to the PS2 and at the same time say that there are plenty of obscure JRPGs missing (and SMT isn't even that obscure). Games that have gone missing proves that the PS3 lacks in depth compared to the PS2. |
lol dude plz FFS
I said before anything else "smaller because it sold less" now using simple logic (which escapes you ALL the time) doesn't that mean not EVERY game would have made it over, I mean I get it, you being who you are but seriously
and no if you have FPS represented on your console missing one FPS doesn't mean you lack FPS therefor you don't lack depth, every genre of gaming represented on the ps2 is also on the ps3 in form or another show me how that's not a fact
as far as variety and breath of genre's/experiences provided the ps3 and ps2 are near identical, this includes the AAA and AA style games
and to not get too off topic, this developer specifically is making is a free to play MMO FPS to which he says neither Sony or MS would support, despite the fact that Sony is releasing this very year a third party free to play MMO FPS... which would join the likes of Home, DCUO, and Free Realms as already supported Free to Play MMOs already released, so to say Sony wouldn't support this is just not true
now go ahead and deny it
