By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - I think it's safe to say the PS3 is the definitive graphics king for this gen

That FF pic is CGI



Around the Network

honestly they are just the same.



Chevinator123 said:

Real time GAMEPLAY

Ah almost forgot about that big guy! Sucked to be him in the end.  A rare moment of calm for Kratos. One of those 'moving painting' moments from GOW3.



Sucked to be everyone in that game.



TadpoleJackson said:
Bullshots and trailer screens aren't proof of anything ^


Yep, every shot I've seen posted in this thread has more AA than a Pixar movie when every PS3 game I've witnessed in real life has little to no AA.



Around the Network

Im just curious as to when was PC ever involved in these wars? Did anybody really include PC in the war when it was SNES vs Genesis? PS1 vs N64? PS2 vs NGC vs Xbox? (im sure somewhere in there there's also Saturn, Jaguar, 3DO etc..). So why does it feel that PC needs to be involved in these console wars more than ever?

Honestly, IMO, PC should never be involved cause PC is on a different level. Console games are developed using hardware that's going to be the same for the next 6-10 years whereas PC gets a new graphics card like every two weeks. So whatever PC game you play can look significantly better just by upgrading your gcard easily whereas a console game will look the same regardless (aside from using component or HDMI wires and SDTV or HDTV but that has nothing to do with the hardware that is used to run the games). Also, when a new console comes out using whatever Nvidia or ATI graphics card, there's already a way better PC graphics card that puts it to shame.

Also, those that mention about multiplat games are better on 360, I agree cause obviously majority of multiplat games are developed for 360 first. But for any of the games that were developed for PS3, did the PS3 version look better or worst than the 360 ports, I'd like to know if anybody knows. From what i've read, games developed for PS3 first looks better than their 360 ports as well. So can we really add multiplat games to this thread?

Nobody's wrong in this thread, we all just have a different perception as to what we feel should and shouldnt belong in this "graphics king" battle.

So for me, I agree PS3 is graphics king as I will not include the all-powerful PC into this as i never did since I started gaming with the original NES. And multiplat games are equal seeing as the better graphics are in favor of whichever console it's originally developed for first.

So in the end it's only just about the exclusives lol

I would really like to see a 3rd party dev make the same game for 360 and PS3 from scratch and no porting. Or have the best exclusive dev from each console make the same game as best as possible using the exact same layout designs etc. and let the fans decide. That would be exciting! ...of course each dev gets like say 2 years to make it. We dont want like Epic games to make one and Team Ico or else we'll never play Team Ico's version lol



The Last of US...



Yes I believe that is fair to say, however I have never played an XboX game before to compare :P



                                  Gaming Away Life Since 1985


green_sky said:

The Last of US...


Ok that made me laugh. AHAHAHAHA!



The Wii and 360 rant even close to what PS3 Exclusives look like