Oh, please... If there was a God then everything would be ending up just the way it's supposed to. Even some fucking animals (LOL) are gay, and they don't even have a free will. Did God make a mistake when creating these animals?

My personal apologies, I ment no offense to the cave tribes.

except that personally extends no further than his actual person.  he feels that gay people should be allowed to marry.

so the article seems to intentionally misrepresent his position on the matter.

Homosexuality is not a race ... There are significant differences between sexuality and race, and trying to make them equivalent is not reasonable.

Beyond that, while I'm fully willing to admit that people are attracted to what they're attracted to with almost no control over it, homosexuality is a lifestlye choice; much like heterosexuality, swinging, bondage, being a playboy, and countless other pursuits. A heterosexual marriage is a very particular kind of lifestyle choice which (for a long time) has received substantial benefits from the government, and the argument is that this is discriminatory against other lifestyle choices. The solution to this problem is not to open up the same benefits to a handful of significantly different lifestyle choices while still discriminating against everyone else.

I put quotations on God so don't start an atheist argument with me.

I'm just saying by design gay sex wasn't probably was not intended. But frankly I don't care what people do as long as its consensual.

After listening to what he says it is obvious he wants a christian theocracy

I guess I used the wrong word for it. My point was though that being gay is not always something you choose, so punishing people who got born in a different way than others would be just like hating on people for being born black or white or whatever.

You get my point.

Comparing homosexuality and heterosexuality  to swinging and bondage is ridiculous. You're comparing simple attraction to fucked up fetishes.

Why does the prostate gland stimulate orgasm then

A few things...
The reason we have 50 laws regarding gay marriage is because in every state constitution there is a clause that states that the United States constitution has supreme authority, and the next authoritative law is federal law. If there isn't a federal law prohibiting something, then the states can choose to have a law that forbids or preserves the right. (Another state law: the minimum drinking age in America under federal law is 18, but any state that has a drinking age below 21 loses federal funding for roads. Since Native American reservations don't need to follow state law, there potentially is a reservation in America where you can drink if you are 18.)

Santorum is not a "distant third", he is very much in the running at second place for the GOP bid. He was ahead of Romney as late as February 20th

Ron Paul is a devout christian and most certainly is not "ok with" gay marriage. He simply believes that the federal government doesn't have the right to say who can marry who, he thinks the issue should be at a state level (He's a big constitutionalist, and that's from Article 4, which lays out the state's rights)

And finally, Santorum cannot "unmarry" any gay couples, even if he passes a federal law forbidding it, because of a legal term known as a "grandfather clause", which allows people to continue doing something that they previously have done even after it becomes illegal. For more information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandfather_clause