360 easily. your not a true gamer if you haven't played through the gears of war series. Though MS needs more exclusives for xbox what we do get is top notch.
Inb4 banned because not sony or wii fanboy.
Which console has the best exclusives? | |||
Xbox 360 | 101 | 14.45% | |
PS3 | 405 | 57.94% | |
Wii | 191 | 27.32% | |
Total: | 697 |
360 easily. your not a true gamer if you haven't played through the gears of war series. Though MS needs more exclusives for xbox what we do get is top notch.
Inb4 banned because not sony or wii fanboy.
usrevenge said: 360 easily. your not a true gamer if you haven't played through the gears of war series. Though MS needs more exclusives for xbox what we do get is top notch. Inb4 banned because not sony or wii fanboy. |
usrevenge said: 360 easily. your not a true gamer if you haven't played through the gears of war series. Though MS needs more exclusives for xbox what we do get is top notch. Inb4 banned because not sony or wii fanboy. |
OMFG IM NOT A TRUE GAMER ????????????
shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.
-_-
Torillian said:
You don't honestly think that Skyward Sword is going to sell those kind of numbers if they remake it in 14 years do you? Yeah OoT as a game is more renowned as a classic than Halo, but that doesn't mean every Zelda game gets that same treatment. I have an incredibly hard time believing people will remember a random Zelda that didn't even sell that hot more so than the game that made an entire console company viable (Halo). |
Skyward Sword will be remembered for its awesome Wii controls (i know, there's nothing on earth that everyone likes), Phantom Hourglass will be remembered for the excellent use of the DS, Spirit Track not as much, now only the future can show what will be remembered
but definitely Halo sales don't indicate that people remember it, unlike God of War and Pokemon for example
also, many misunderstood me in here, just to clear it out, i may support Wii and Nintendo the most, but i have all 3 consoles, and i'm a fan of all 3 companies, i played Halo ODST (and it was awesome of course), same for Forza and some Ps3 exclusives like GoW3
it's that Wii fits more to my lifestyle, i like movement, but i find it pathetic that people have enforced the anti-Wii/Nintendo spirit because the Xbox360 is catching up, it deserves to sell, but Nintendo also deserves the 1st place it's got this gen
don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^
Shinobi-san said:
shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit. -_- |
Yeah you should probably throw your playstation in a lake and forget about your passion. You haven't played gears of war. You aren't a true gamer, like me and usrevenge.
ClassicGamingWizzz said: i vote ps3 cause 360 only have one exclusive that i could pay for it (gears) and nintendo have 2 (zelda and metroid) |
I dont see much of a difference with Sony's and MS's line up in terms of genres other than Sony release exclusives for more genres. But for the most part they deal with the same genres : Racing, action adventure, TPS, FPS.
Basically what im saying is...since you only like one 360 game...id imagine you dont like a hell of a lot of the ps3 exlcusives either. That or you find that the ps3 exclusives are way beyond 360 exclusives in quality...in which case matacritic does not agree with you.
dark_gh0st_b0y said:
because Nintendo choose, instead of releasing Wii Sports 3, Wii Fit 3, NSMBW2, Mario Kart Wii 2, Galaxy 3, Kinect Wii, Vitality sensor, Super Smash 4, nunckuck plus and so on so forth, decided to focus on 3DS and WiiU, it's common sense HD fans just got the chance to revive the ''Wii is shit'' thing because it's not selling that good in 2011/2012 there is no reason to count million sellers since we already know that Wii exclusives gave it the 1st place this gen, it has the most software sales by far, whether you like the games or not, and it won't change |
You mean like Gamecube?
At some point this sales=quality notion needs to die.
The success of a system depends on a whole lot of things. Innovation / lowest price / best exclusives / time of release /marketing/hype etc. Anything alone is not enough. It's all or most of these things put together.
Here's the reasons I bought a wii in 2008.
1)The ps3 was bloody expensive, I didn't have much money and due to bad press I was under the impression that Sony were making a huge profit on each console because they were greedy.
2)The hype of Wii Sports was insane. I played the game for a few months (though spent about 30 hours in total) and was quite bored after that
3)I wanted to play WiiFit to lose wait. I played it for about 20 hours and was hugely disappointed. I had tons of fun playing Naruto (wii) though (my first Naruto game on an next generation console).
I also bought Super Mario Galaxy due to hype and because the Wii offered no other games that interested me. I played it for a few hours, but didn't enjoy it that much (nevertheless, I think it's a 9,5/10 game, just not for me).
I bought a ps3 in 2009 and have about 130 games vs 8 wii games (though I have no doubt that there are tons of wii games that I never got to play that are brilliant)
This is not a Wii Sucks post. I'm just trying to show that the success of a game or console can depend on many reasons, quality might be one of them, but definitely not the only, and for everyone.
Shinobi-san said:
shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit. -_- |
SEEMS LEGIT
RolStoppable said:
Looks like you didn't understand my point. The sales comparison I am applying here is limited to each system's own library, not one against another. On the Wii, exclusives sell by far the best. On both the 360 and PS3 it is multiplatform games dominating the bestsellers list, so the exclusives on these systems can't be as great as the heavily biased sample we have in this thread suggests. On the Wii, you can say with absolute certainty that its exclusives are the best games on the system. On the HD consoles, you can't. If those exclusives were as great as this thread suggests (well, this goes first and foremost for the PS3), then owners of these consoles wouldn't choose multiplatform games over exclusives. If someone wants to convince others that the PS3 has the best exclusives, then they should start by explaining why PS3 owners are hesitant to spend their money on exclusives. The other option would be to just look at this thread in the way of "What is your favorite console?", but this would be boring. |
Agreed with bolded, disagree with italicized/underlined. It's like saying that Call of Duty mw/ bo is better than Mass Effect/Forza 3 etc. They buy the game because of hype or many other possible reasons.
I absolutely despise FPS (always get dizzy when I play them), but still bought Killzone 2 and 3 because some friends of mine like them (plus they were really cheap). It's a reason to invite them over and then play Tekken 6
naruball said: You mean like Gamecube? At some point this sales=quality notion needs to die. The success of a system depends on a whole lot of things. Innovation / lowest price / best exclusives / time of release /marketing/hype etc. Anything alone is not enough. It's all or most of these things put together. Here's the reasons I bought a wii in 2008. 1)The ps3 was bloody expensive, I didn't have much money and due to bad press I was under the impression that Sony were making a huge profit on each console because they were greedy. 2)The hype of Wii Sports was insane. I played the game for a few months (though spent about 30 hours in total) and was quite bored after that 3)I wanted to play WiiFit to lose wait. I played it for about 20 hours and was hugely disappointed. I had tons of fun playing Naruto (wii) though (my first Naruto game on an next generation console). I also bought Super Mario Galaxy due to hype and because the Wii offered no other games that interested me. I played it for a few hours, but didn't enjoy it that much (nevertheless, I think it's a 9,5/10 game, just not for me). I bought a ps3 in 2009 and have about 130 games vs 8 wii games (though I have no doubt that there are tons of wii games that I never got to play that are brilliant) This is not a Wii Sucks post. I'm just trying to show that the success of a game or console can depend on many reasons, quality might be one of them, but definitely not the only, and for everyone. |
there's not a single thing on earth that likes to everyone, if that was the case Wii would have sold 150m +, the thing is what likes to most people, and in this case, the sales of Wii exclusives speak by themselves, this site is all about sales, and therefore the answer to the thread title but of course the point is that everyone tells his/her opinion
it depends on many things, but Nintendo games in this case is the main reason Wii succeed, people got it because it was cheap, in order to play Nintendo games which they heard from others are awesome and that's why many Nintendo Wii's games had the legs of 20m
sales mean a higher chance to be quality in someone's eyes actually
like Rol said, consumers vote with their wallets, same for music and movies, now if VGC members like PS3 exclusives the most, nothing wrong with that, i like them too, just not as much as the Wii exclusives
don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^