Baalzamon said: One thing I find most humorous about this whole situation, which is something that gets mentioned in every single one of these threads, is that having a second market INCREASES the overall market size, and the amount of new games that get purchased. If people knew they wouldn't be able to sell games either after they complete them or dislike them, they are either going to wait for extremely good deals (which can't possibly make the publisher much money), or not buy the game at all, because they feel it is too much of a risk. |
Yeah, I would personally wait until the consoles dropped below $150 and I would only buy games when they hit bargain bin prices, although if this kind of stuff went into place I would probably give up gaming altogether.
If devs really want this, then I guess they don't really want my business.
I really dislike this idea where they feel they should have rights and control over products even after we purchase them.
If I want to sell it, I should be able to sell it. If I want to buy someone elses copy, I should be able to buy someone else copy.
Also, did I read this right? Did he say we could go to something like Redbox, rent the game, then pay an additional fee to then play it after we already paid to rent it? I think I may have read that part wrong.
Yup, read it wrong. Either way, what would that for people when they rent physical copies at Redbox? Would his idea kill it entirely? It is already bad enough that when I rent a game I can't play it online...
Want to rent Uncharted 3 from Redbox and play it online? $1.99/night please, oh yeah, plus you need to spend $10 for an online pass that you don't get the money back for when the game goes back to Redbox. So want it for a week? $20 please.