Also important off course.

Although for the very very best looking games I could settle for ~48fps, depends on the type of game as well.

60 FPS is overrated.  It makes things move too smooth.  I think 30 FPS gives games a more realistic feel, especially since its close to the framerate of films.  IMO, 60 FPS should be reserved for games with a more cartoony artstyle and racing games (helps with the illusion of speed).

no way! playing battlefield 3 with 40 fps is so bad if you've played it with 60+ fps and everything under 40 is horrible if you are used to the 60fps in my opinion. maybe some feel like you but for me it's a huuuge difference and not to the better with less fps. if i would have never played it with 60+ maybe i wouldn't care so much but i played it 50 hours with 60+ and then i've used the "fxaa injector" for nicer graphics and put msaa to 4x. i had 41-47 fps then (depends which map) and i hated it. i tried in some hours but i still hated it so i put msaa to 2x

and yeah like millenium said under me, it depends for the game. i think i don't need 60fps for tomb raider or so^^

for me killing aliasing is the most important for games in the future. i looove forza 4 but i fking hate the aliasing. it'S so horrible i really hate it all the time playing the game.

I half agree with you, 60 fps works better for some games than for others.

To give an example: I believe games like Halo and Uncharted work best in the 30-48fps range.

While games like GT5/Forza, Call of Duty etc are best served with 60fps.

All dependent imo.

Marus Fenix o Gears 1 had 15K polygons means in Gears 3 is probably above 25K.

Well 25K to 1M is crazy

Only the biggest game developers (ones that have like Activision, Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft and EA behind them) could afford the tech that went into Avatar. Gaming has a ways to go before we can spend that kind of money on a game.

Great now I look stupid. XD

It doesnt make sense to go from 30 000 to 1 million in a short lapse of time.

No that stuff has to be created, it's just the flesh melting away in real time is tesselation bassed.That and the real time transformations. It allows devs to make much more dynamic and interactive models.

I'm so glad Millenium and Zarx pointed out that this already exists.

The website that posted this 'story' is an utter embarrassment. The posting CLEARLY states ''this digital sculptor will be responsible for making million poly models game ready''
The million poly models aren't the ones being used in game, they are being adjusted to be put into the game. This has been happening this generation (again thanks to zarx for pointing it out)

Likewise the article completely ignores the wording. ''Prior professional experience with normal map extraction of human models for next-gen games'' It states prior professional experience.... so this website assumes it is for the ps4...... really? It isn't saying you need experience to do this for next gen games, it is saying you need experience of doing it in next gen games. The listing is talking about past experience on next-gen games. Basically it is referring to the 360 and PS3 as next-gen, so they get people with the right experience.

I guess the good thing about this article is that I now know to ignore anything playstationlifestyle.net says.