By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Microsoft comments on lack of new Xbox 360 exclusive IPs

 

  • LittleBigPlanet 2 (PS3)


Around the Network
Nsanity said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Nsanity said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DirtyP2002 said:
deskpro2k3 said:
coolbeans said:
deskpro2k3 said:

I prefer a wide variety of different game choices, and this year xbox360 has no games.

Depends upon where you look.


true to a degree, but it's obvious where to look.


I disagree 100%. IMO there is no console this generation that offers so much variety like a Xbox 360 with Kinect.

Anything done on Kinect can be done with far greater accuracy  on the Move (proven) and you dont need rails. The Kinect just more attractive to casuals who hate controls. The Move has titles both Kinect and Wii had exclusively. The best product and the best of both world whilst doing its own thing. Sony has far more high quality core titles with variety and in 2012 they've got their eyes set on multiplayer with Dust 415, Twisted Metal and Starhawk as well as single player exclusives. I got the PS3 in 2009 and still havent finished the quality backlog because the top games in the backlog because theres so many new games coming in. Microsoft cannot say this. I've already played Microsofts backlog. 

Notice: I said the best product, not the most popular.

These rants of yours are entirely opinionated not facts, so how about you stop ramming down other users throats.


So wait..when it comes to gaming you're saying Kinect can do more? I need proof of this. I'm  not talking about business, I'm not talking about the medical field, but rather gaming.

Mass Effect 3 , Ghost Recon and Forza 4?


Easily remedied:

1. Mass Effect 3: Headset with Mic

2.  Ghost Recon and Forza 4: Move and/or gaming wheel.

You must forget the Move can control things with depth within a 3D or augmented reality space. The Kinect cannot.



Ajescent said:
Turkish said:
360 has neither the quality or quantity of exclusive games. They only have Kinect games. Shame tho


Wouldn't say "only", Gears, Forza and Halo have merits and I heard talk of PGR umming and erring of making a comeback....or did I imagine that?


Just rumor and speculation.



pezus said:
^What's that? Your collection?


A pretty sexy collection of games he bought this year I'm guessing. 



Ajescent said:
People always say XBLA games are far superior to PSN games as if PSN haz no gaemz...why is that?

Do these folks play both sets before coming to this conclusion or because MS bothers to advertise their XBLA games?

 

that's why

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=137739&page=1

 



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

Around the Network

MS Studios are obviously working on something and independent developers are still publishing on XBLA. That's really not in question.

The issue is that those development resources are being largely poured into Kinect games as there is no debate that MS has shifted focus into expanding their market through the same type of family games, children's games, etc. that were responsible for expanding Nintendo's audience with the Wii.

Where does everyone realistically think those record hardware sales are coming from? Rhetorical question; it's from Kinect sales.

While there's no reliable way to track this kind of thing, I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear that a significant percentage of new Xbox 360 owners (first time buyers) who bought a Kinect bundle did so to replace that Wii that's no longer being used.

It's been well over a year now and the market still hasn't seen any Halo Kinect virtual simulator much less an all new IP custom tailored for the core audience. When Dance Central is one of the best merits showcasing the success of Kinect as a new platform, that about says all one needs to know about where both the focus and the audience is for Kinect.

As for XBLA, DD budget games provide massive variety when it comes to game selection, providing plenty of alternatives to buying new release retail games at $60 each. That said, I don't know know of many people buying consoles because there was an exclusive XBLA or PSN DD title that they felt was so compelling that they were convinced to adopt a new gaming platform and buy another game console for the living room. Truth is, I don't know of anyone who bought a console to play a downloadable budget title.



DirtyP2002 said:
Ajescent said:
People always say XBLA games are far superior to PSN games as if PSN haz no gaemz...why is that?

Do these folks play both sets before coming to this conclusion or because MS bothers to advertise their XBLA games?

 

that's why

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=137739&page=1

 

That doesn't justify the hate for PSn games, yes XBLA is good but doesn't mean PSN doesn't have ANYTHING to offer. The dislike is overblown.



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

smroadkill15 said:
Ajescent said:
Turkish said:
360 has neither the quality or quantity of exclusive games. They only have Kinect games. Shame tho


Wouldn't say "only", Gears, Forza and Halo have merits and I heard talk of PGR umming and erring of making a comeback....or did I imagine that?


Just rumor and speculation.

PGR was only relevant prior to the Forza franchise. 

While I'm sure developers can do something interesting with what would now be just another driving game in an already crowded field, compared to Forza, PGR would be a second string title with limited appeal. Mostly PGR fans. 



pezus said:
^What's that? Your collection?


January 2011-January 2012. Just felt like posting it.



S.T.A.G.E. said:
happydolphin said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Nope...its not embarrassing. The $60 retails are the games which are generationally used to sway the console wars are the ones who count and provide the face of a console. XBLA doesn't have to lose a year to PSN. PSN and XBLA are just additions with lower budget titles or old classics (thats all).They ARE pretty much even NOW, backlog or no backlog. 

Respectfully, I starkly disagree. For one I don't remember any support for downloadable games in the pre-Wii-HD era.

Since the whole WIiware/XBLA/PSN program is a new phenomenon in the industry, it's time we recognize it. 

Thirdly, if you fail to follow the times, what will you do when all software becomes DLable? Segregate by price? No way...

The metrics are quality and enjoyment. If a game is of high quality but provides little excitement, it still fails to satisfy the industry as you seem to advocate for.

Wait...you mean to tell me that you believe XBLA and PSN are console sellers?

As a whole, yes. They are life support in a sense and satisfy a portion of diet like Jay said. If I were to tell you two consoles have respectable exclusives, but one also offers more interesting dl'able games, without deeper knowledge, which would you go for? Also, if I were not a fan of Sony's games, I'd certainly rather a 360 for the alternate kinect/XBLA diet, easy. It's what you would call value-add.

 

And what of the day when all becomes software-only? What then?