Nsanity said:
Mass Effect 3 , Ghost Recon and Forza 4? |
Easily remedied:
1. Mass Effect 3: Headset with Mic
2. Ghost Recon and Forza 4: Move and/or gaming wheel.
You must forget the Move can control things with depth within a 3D or augmented reality space. The Kinect cannot.
Ajescent said:
|
Just rumor and speculation.
pezus said: ^What's that? Your collection? |
A pretty sexy collection of games he bought this year I'm guessing.
Ajescent said: People always say XBLA games are far superior to PSN games as if PSN haz no gaemz...why is that? Do these folks play both sets before coming to this conclusion or because MS bothers to advertise their XBLA games? |
that's why
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=137739&page=1
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
MS Studios are obviously working on something and independent developers are still publishing on XBLA. That's really not in question.
The issue is that those development resources are being largely poured into Kinect games as there is no debate that MS has shifted focus into expanding their market through the same type of family games, children's games, etc. that were responsible for expanding Nintendo's audience with the Wii.
Where does everyone realistically think those record hardware sales are coming from? Rhetorical question; it's from Kinect sales.
While there's no reliable way to track this kind of thing, I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear that a significant percentage of new Xbox 360 owners (first time buyers) who bought a Kinect bundle did so to replace that Wii that's no longer being used.
It's been well over a year now and the market still hasn't seen any Halo Kinect virtual simulator much less an all new IP custom tailored for the core audience. When Dance Central is one of the best merits showcasing the success of Kinect as a new platform, that about says all one needs to know about where both the focus and the audience is for Kinect.
As for XBLA, DD budget games provide massive variety when it comes to game selection, providing plenty of alternatives to buying new release retail games at $60 each. That said, I don't know know of many people buying consoles because there was an exclusive XBLA or PSN DD title that they felt was so compelling that they were convinced to adopt a new gaming platform and buy another game console for the living room. Truth is, I don't know of anyone who bought a console to play a downloadable budget title.
DirtyP2002 said:
that's why http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=137739&page=1
|
That doesn't justify the hate for PSn games, yes XBLA is good but doesn't mean PSN doesn't have ANYTHING to offer. The dislike is overblown.
smroadkill15 said:
|
PGR was only relevant prior to the Forza franchise.
While I'm sure developers can do something interesting with what would now be just another driving game in an already crowded field, compared to Forza, PGR would be a second string title with limited appeal. Mostly PGR fans.
pezus said: ^What's that? Your collection? |
January 2011-January 2012. Just felt like posting it.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Wait...you mean to tell me that you believe XBLA and PSN are console sellers? |
As a whole, yes. They are life support in a sense and satisfy a portion of diet like Jay said. If I were to tell you two consoles have respectable exclusives, but one also offers more interesting dl'able games, without deeper knowledge, which would you go for? Also, if I were not a fan of Sony's games, I'd certainly rather a 360 for the alternate kinect/XBLA diet, easy. It's what you would call value-add.
And what of the day when all becomes software-only? What then?