In this scenario I've found a brilliant loophole in an IP law, which means that you - yes, YOU - have the ability to move one franchise from a company and move it to another. 

- Which will you choose?

- Why?

- What effect do you think this found have on each company?

Would Halo be better with Nintendo? Could Microsoft finally release that MMO Pokemon game that everyone wants? Could Sony own both GT and Forza? 

Final Fantasy to anybody who can get it out quicker

Pokemon to Blizzard not a fan of WoW/Starcraft but if they had the pokemon license, I think they could do a great job.

LoZ to Sony.. I haven't played any of the newer ones since Wind Waker because I don't have Wii. Always loved the series and would love to play it on the PS3 or 4 but I know it's impossible :P

Angry Birds to Nintendo... they wouldn't make millions with it but billions..

Alan Wake to Sony, because that is where it's audience is.

Valkyria Chronicles from Sega to Atlus - because they at least release their games in west.

Mirror's Edge to anyone who will make a sequel

mario from nintendo to the worst developer in the world so they could kill it... enough is enough... its like a awful drug... people want to give up but nint don't let them, by dealing, non stop, the "product".

besides... i hate it.

I would take Tales away from Namco and give to a company that actually localises most of it's games for Europe, Rising Star and NoE for example.

Hmmmm

Probably Syphon Filter to Ubisoft, we might actually see a release then, and I'd be able to get it on X360. They do well with Splinter Cell as well so I reckon they could make a great SF game

Edit - and obviously this would have zero impact on Sony.