Want you to believe? Oh really?

Then I guess I must be getting fake results when I study conservation of RNAs through polymorfism chains between Archae and Eubacterya or the Epigenetic effect of hystone H1, H2A and H2B between hereditary lineages of multi-species. Heck, I must change my master's degree, since it's all lies.

I've seen quite a lot of misinformation on this thread to have quite a few chuckles for the past weeks. Evolution is not simply "We came from a single archae bacteria that developed when the conditions of the Nitrogen and Carbon filled oceans of 3.5 Billions ago were jolted by the extreme conditions of the planet". 

To understand evolution you have to understand some basic genetic concepts. You have to understand polymorfisms, DNA and (much more importantly) RNA conservation, epigenetics, methylations, acylations and many other concepts. 

Do you know that us, human, have a 90% homology in our mitochondrial RNA matrixes (produced by the mitochondrial DNA) in comparison with early pre-historic Archaebacteria? We're talking about having a rather similar code to organisms that lived far beyond the time of humans.

If you look at evolution only on Darwin terms, then you're missing the rather huge picture that explains everything in much more detail: Genetics.

Sadly you're wasting your time.  Right as you may be, no amount of evidence will change his mind. "It's all just a liberal agenda, maaannn."  People with their heads this far up their asses can't see the light for the shit that surrounds them, or something.  

quick, get the tinfoil! 

The thing is, I really don't care if people believe humans are some kind of "special" being that somehow isn't bound by the same biological rules as any other living being as some people here declared. People are free to believe whatever they choose to believe.

Now in the case of angrypoolman, he's making a mockery of one of the most valid fields in science nowadays and calls it all a conspiracy, as if everyone working on that field has no validity whatsoever and we're only trying to fool everyone else. It sickens me when people use that kind of agenda to discredit people who actually work hard in their field.

Might be worth starting with what are your conclusions on evolution are with the knowledge you have. Might make debating a bit easier.

Before anyone tries explaining what evolution is to Christians, I think that you must make them aware of what a theory is in the fields of science. Disbelievers misinterpret a theory for a hypothesis.

Here is how the two are contrasted via Wikipedia, which is identical to how my science professors have explained it.

"Hypotheses are individual empirically testable conjectures, while theories are collections of hypotheses that are logically linked together into a coherent explanation of some aspect of reality and which have individually or jointly received some empirical support."

A perfect example of how the word theory has been misinterpreted, in the United States at least, is the term "Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy 'Theories'". There has not been a single theory to the conspiracy claims of the Kennedy assassination, as none of the claims have contained "collections of hypotheses that are logically linked together into a coherent explanation of some aspect of reality and which have individually or jointly received some empirical support."

Additionally, the only subject that is truly factually based is mathematics. Even gravity is a theory, via Newton's Theory of Gravitation. If Christians are going to disbelieve evolution, they should also disbelieve gravity.

Well I don't have time to read every page. This is often because atheists and many Scientists bundle all of Evolution theory with fact.

Evolution occurs and within a species is fact. However their is little evidence of a species completely changing into another. Most evidence is circumstantial. Many also don't believe much of what scientists say because they are often wrong. In history how much Science still remains proven fact? Not much.

Also the fossil record is inconsistent. Species are found on a regular basis that are supposed to be extinct some over 400 million years ago. Yet their found living and breathing today. So when a scientist says this animal was.extinct 400 million years ago or a billion years ago not many take them seriously.

Abiogenesis and Big Bang theory are both unlikely to ever be recognized. Because they are used to disprove God which they might but they also might not.

Many Christians today support Micro Evolution and even convergent evolution. They will not support anything that is scientific theory. Only fact.

Christians often hold a view that the English translation Genesis is completely fact. If they read the actual Hebrew and other translations. Their is reason to believe that the story was fact but not as the English translation necessarily says.

The Genesis story does not explain in detail how God created the earth. So much theology and interpretation involved. No believer in any belief system is going to be swayed by anything not entirely proven in fact. As such Atheists and Christians and Jews, Muslims they will never be swayed and science will never prove God does or does not exist.